Ok...
to follow up my last post I believe theres many key moments over the course of the interview and previous evidence which dont make sense to me. Maybe they will to others, hence the reason im posting.
1. BDs own version of events claimed she was clearly in the frame of mind where she needs help searching, and was panicking, yet this best friend left ?
What, really ? you're just going to peace out right now and she will have to call another friend to come help her to use HIS car to search for Tyler, because "the best friend" has driven off home in his own car ?
This is the same friend who had a keycard to the hotel room, so at worst he could have taken a nap there and still been around to help if required at a moments notice. Also, he and Tyler were supposedly drunk to the point they fell asleep in the Uber just an hour before, so whys he driving home ? Surely the plan all along was for him to have the keycard as they knew theyd be drinking and he could crash at the hotel after the Uber.
Not to mention its claimed "the friend" saw Tyler while searching and then left him again.
Yet, she stands by "the friend" after ALL of this and calls him a good guy, id be FURIOUS, maybe just me ? but I think it would be natural for anyone to be really angry at "the friend" - this was the friend close enough to design their wedding ring too ?
I also have no doubts the Uber driver will verify their story up to the point he dropped them off, both male passengers asleep, she wakes "the friend" up and then they help Tyler out of the car.
2. A camera showed what was at one time believed to be Tyler heading to the hotel. Later on it was discovered it was actually "the friend" who was on this footage.
Pretty simple here, who originally ID`d the footage, did BD or "the friend" ever ID the footage to be that of Tyler ?
I hope they had never mistakenly ID`d "the friend" as Tyler previously.....I guess thats something only LE would know for sure at this point.
But the fact Tylers friends were saying it had been ID`d as Tyler previously suggests its possible someone did ID the person in the footage as Tyler, and who would LE likely ask first to ID this footage ?
3. Lack of camera evidence. Lack of 3rd party sightings
So, other than the camera picking up "the friend" at one point, Tyler himself has essentially vanished into thin air, theres a lot of cameras in the area, it was unfortunate he may have gone into the direction of where the fewest (or maybe even no cameras) were. Just another possible unfortunate event ? They also have no one come forward from the missing flyers to say they saw someone walking around drunkenly that night ? again, unfortunate.
4. Google location services pinged at Ross Park / Abbot labs.
Ive seen people post that the phone pinged here, but I havent noticed (maybe it has been mentioned) that the I-270 travels southbound very close to this building, probably close enough for a phone from a car to ping at Abbot labs.
Is this a possible reason it pinged at this location rather than it pinging from the other side ?
If it was on the other side, there seems to be a large, and i would imagine abandoned car park at that time of day right there.
5. Why did she tell us the story about how she was worried about possibly having her drinks spiked ?
If Tylers body ever turns up with traces of a drug in it though....
She also mentioned an altercation between Tyler and bouncers, would love to know their statements on what Tylers condition was, drunk or more ?
6. In part 2 of the TCG @ 35:20...
she gets very flustered about a question regarding whether her friend could be involved.
"i dont think he had any part in.....I think it was really the wrong time..... wrong situation.....at that time like when we were doing it.. like when all this was happening...." then some garbled speech.
When "we were doing it ?" doing what ? Maybe she mis-spoke, but why so nervous at this point and not to the other questions ? she`d been pretty calm otherwise throughout.
Thoughts welcome !
