- Jan 19, 2007
- Reaction score
I agree the FBI appeared to think he was truthful and I could not imagine taking him at his word (I would like to believe they are much smarter than he was). IK was leading them by giving them tidbits. There was so much he left out and the rest just lies. He talked almost in taunting riddles. Of course, he knew about Bundy.never ever, ever take the confessions of a psychopathic serial killer at his word. I thought it very interesting that the FBI agents confused the words of IK as being truthful.. An example is when IK acted as though he did not know Ted Bundy's birthplace was Burlington, VT., where he abducted/murdered the Curriers. IK looked up to Bundy, and was intelligent, meticulous, and confident. IK would have known this commonly known bit of trivia, imo...
Imo, the timeline released by the FBI is incomplete at best. IK was a master at deception and played them like a fiddle for decades and continues to do so, imo...
I have been cautious not to attribute any cold cases to IK, but I have given Pastor Daniel's case much thought. IK's MO fits here. When you mentioned about the tornadoes and the possibility it led him to that area, it made sense.
By the way, the eyewitness was Richardson instead of Robertson. I buy his story.