Oscar Pistorius was not a sociopath
many individuals that had a close relationship with him describe him, for lack of a better term, as completely normal.
Yes, he had a few personality traits that were somewhat undesirable and that surfaced in very specific circumstances
but who doesn't ?
These undesirable personality traits were probably exacerbated by the fame that was bestowed upon him
but that is to be expected
what star does not exhibit some form of entitlement and arrogance ?
The facts is that Oscar Pistorius was for all intents and purposes a well adjusted, successful, healthy, normal individual.
It is far to easy to deconstruct an individual with hindsight and so call 'discover' a latent propensity that could explain a punctual dramatic event.
I do not believe that a single event caused Oscar Pistorius to shoot and kill Reeva on 14 February 2013
suggesting that after a few months of dating, a mere argument between them could escalate in a matter of 2 hours or so into a murderous rage is not very reasonable or believable.
Something more profound and fundamental had to be plaguing Oscar for some time
Like all individuals, it is a plethora of things, big and small alike, that shape our behaviors throughout our lives.
I believe most would agree with the following statement : Oscar's professional athletic career was the keystone of his identity.
Oscar's hard work and training led to :
1- Performance, success, etc.
2- Fame, glory, self-respect, self-esteem, respect and esteem by others, etc.
3- Personal financial security, lifestyle, material wealth, etc.
One can use Maslow's theory on the hierarchy of needs to get a sense of how Oscar's athletic career was an fundamental part of his identity, his motivations, his behaviors and his personality.
Since his disappointing performance and embarrassment at the 2012 London Olympics and Paralympics, Oscar Pistorius was contemplating the harsh reality that his professional athletic career was rapidly coming to an end and furthermore, that it had ended on a rather sour note.
I believe one can find MANY unmistakable clues in support of this fact.
Oscar Pistorius realized that he was past his prime and that the advantages which promoted his earlier successes were rapidly fading.
At the end of 2012, beginning of 2013, Oscar Pistorius was confronted with a profound existential decision :
Option 1 - Voluntarily stop training and subtract himself from further competition
gradually loose the lime-light, sponsorships and product ambassadorships revenue streams
start contemplating what he would do next for the rest of his life which would certainly be far less glamorous.
Option 2 - Keep training and competing
attempt to end his career on a high note
but with an ever growing risk of disappointments and embarrassments which would further sour his athletic legacy
eventually but inevitably being steered into option 1 reluctantly.
Neither of these options were appealing to Oscar
Psychologically, he was between a rock and a hard place :
- Option 1 meant a drastic life-altering change... giving up the only thing he had known for his entire adult life and going into uncharted waters.
- Option 2 meant possibly waisting his time and energy training, risking his legacy and fading out of relevance pathetically.
This immutable reality was tremendously straining for Oscar Pistorius.