In some ways IMO although a "story" in some places at some times media maybe could hold back for the safety of the area. Sure would some people know he made bail- in all liklihood, but declaring it on all local nedia just seems to put a bunch of people at risk. Use seom jugement calls geezzzz
Its obviouly a crime ridden area, if none of the shells match they should be reporting that, it changes the "find" as it results to this case. Would assume not , however cause he has not been charged in this crime if I am clear on the info.
Forensics would be able to say for sure that the casings matched instead of the reporter stating he had some bullets that kinda sorta resembled some of the shells at the crime scene.
Imo it reeks somewhat of politics, like we are really closing in on the perp in this nationwide awful tradegy. I think if none of this occurred the "maybe" perp being charged on that kinda crime might not even be newsworty, happens 2.4 million times a day across the nation.
Seems like the script for the piece was written carefully - basiclly playing on words to some degree. Would a person having some bullets that may be like some other bullets make it into another story.
Its kinda like saying that some car that kinda was the sameish blue of the car being sought in a getway....IMoo kinda doing some streching here. If the casings, and weapons matched he would be charged with this crime INO
The fact that he has not IMO means that the weapons found in this guys apt don't kinda , sort of, poassibly, have much to do with anything other than he lived in a crime ridden area and had parteaked in breaking the law in other domains.
It also would seem in this day and age as far as DNA goes the three people fighting and slugging each other , grabbing each other in the fight 3 years ago might have a DNA comppnent to it. Lamont now arrested, seems as if , if the DNA from the earlier conflict had been saved, Lamont might be able to be directly linked to that shooting resulting in much more creditibility to the ambush in terms of revenge - again it seems like there is some "stuff" happening only because of the atrocity of the assulat and resultant national coverage mooo not saying any conspiracy stuff ....possibly just about giving thepublic the notion that this may be close to being solved.
I still am hung up regarding the wild murdering of so many females, as to custudy iss ue being the culprit. Some guy in a different part of the city, involved in an incident three years ago is still monitoring this family and knew about a BBQ going on at 958 on some night??
Three years ago is a pretty long time to be waiting to retailate, a drive by 2 years ago would have handled that.
Granted not that far from each other, (14 min (3.1 mi) via Lemington Ave, Brushton Ave and Center St) but how realistic is it to be able to "monitor" activiies 3 miles away, after years have passed, in the murder of the other guy.
would you know that someone you dispise is holding a BBQ 3 miles from you? We don't know, or do we, that FB post regarding the BBQ went out only to family/friedns on whoevers FB page it was that posted it.
It appearred to be a close family unit, so I would kinda doubt that a family member who knew the BBQ was going to happen that night would give the dude a ring a dingy (!) informing him that everyone is goig to be outside that night.
At this point in time it certainly does not seem LE has much "data" to really connect the two events. Probably in answer to some interview questions some might have said XX hate Lamont, but that is kinda a stretch to go slaughter a bunch of people in the back IMO
All I am sayimg is I think there is a lot of streching going on here. I wonder if LE really thing it was that other guy, who they know is gonna be out would ask the media to maybe hold on to Lamonts being "out".