Yep. Where does LE look without the parents answering the simple question of who was coming and going from the house that night? Pretty important to know that when a baby goes missing, but Young used this question as his example of what types of information LE hasn't been able to get from the parents. IMO, it was more than just an example, it is something LE desperately needs from the parents in order to move this investigation forward.
JMO:
We know the drinking neighbor was in the house that night, along with her 4 year old daughter. We know that the teen neighbor "may have been in the house that day" per MSM article regarding the DNA and second interview of the teen. IMO, other people were at that house and/or Debbi left that house on Monday, Oct 3rd. Debbi may claim she cannot remember due to possible drunken black out, but I think the boys could recall some details if allowed; I hope they are able to help their sister and allowed to be questioned on Friday.
JMO. I think the drinking buddy and possibly other witnesses might have told LE about some of the possible comings and goings that night, but they may not know the identity of the visitor(s) or people Debbi left to meet.
IMO there are reasons other than very faulty memory for some of the changes and ommissions in the story of Lisa Irwin's last day & night. They are strategic defense reasons, IMO. I don't understand the strategy yet, but I'm working on some possibilites.
:websleuther:
-There is a reason that Debbi pushed her final sighting of Lisa up by nearly 4 hours. Amber Alter was issued based on last sighting of 10:30 pm in her crib. Actual time of last sighting (according to mom a week later) is 6:40 pm. That first lie was huge. If Lisa was really abducted, fudging on the last time she was seen and misdirecting the possible search area so significantly is an unthinkable betrayal to Lisa, no matter what the reason for the lie/discrepancy. This fact on its own tells me LE should be primarily focused on the parents. JMO.
-There is a reason why Debbi claims she "possibly blacked out drunk".
-There is a reason Debbi's attorney was first saying that the neighbor left at 10:30, then it became 11:00 pm, today it was mentioned as 11:30 pm that the lights went out in the house.
-There is a reason there is not one single mention of Lisa interacting with any other human being aside from Debbi on Monday, Oct 3rd. In all of the interviews by the parents, the PI and the lawyers, not one statement is made about anything that Lisa did or anyone seeing her other than Debbi putting fussy Lisa to bed. It was so odd to me I went back through every article and interview I could find to make sure. Debbi's bedtime contact is the only human contact mentioned in regards to Lisa Irwin after the birthday party Sunday, Oct 2nd. Lisa is the subject of this story, and yet there is not one mention of anything Lisa did or anyone who saw her that whole day except Debbi. It is very peculiar, and there is a reason. ETA: The latest "People" piece cites Jeremy as last seeing Lisa when he left for the night shift on Monday.
Debbi knows the reasons. Jeremy probably does too. LE has suspicions about the reasons for Debbi's changes and omissions, which is why the parents won't agree to answer any and all questions required to help find Lisa. I hope that Lisa's brothers can fill in the holes that the parents won't. For Lisa...
I hope LE keeps looking at every possibility, the parents and all others. Still a chance it was an abduction, but I'd think the parents would be talking up a storm to give LE new ideas if that were the case.
