Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't find that as the Urban Dictionary says: '"the LE check" isn't defined yet'.I didn't quite get that until I looked up "The LE Check" in the urban dictionary.
The Black Hawk Helicopter with the classified camera was directly over that location in April 2011 (and I have video from News12 to confirm that) and her body was NOT there at that time. If her body was there, either on the surface or slightly underwater in a ditch, the classified camera on the Black Hawk helicopter would have picked it up. That camera does not lie!
Not to mention that the precise area where SG was found was searched thoroughly on foot as well!
Honestly, I think that it is possible she could have been missed. 1 full summer was enough for full decomp. I dont think bones tucked under a bush could be recognized by software or eye in an aerial captured image. They may have also been covered or wrapped. The analysts were probably focused west of oak beach, over examinig sticks, or they saw the remains and mic'd em etc for surveillance and were waiting, hopefully they are that good.your post has been on my mind for a while & tonight I searched & found the Newsday video of the Black Hawk helicopter here:
http://www.newsday.com/video/helicopter-search-1.2825326
Per the report, the helicopter started in the eastern side of Oak Beach and then went west to Gilgo Beach....and sure nuff, the helicopter did fly over the marsh & I got a screen capture here that shows the helicopter in relation to the gate. (the Oak Beach sign is perpendicular to the gate)
Then I have a screen capture of the Charlie Hannon PI video showing the relation of the sign to the gate that can be seen in the 1st screen capture and then finally, a Bing map screen capture of the gate.
So, why didn't that helicopter see her remains, etc back in April 2011??? I am curious though, how do you know the marsh was previously searched on foot? Is there a report?
Honestly, I think that it is possible she could have been missed. 1 full summer was enough for full decomp. I dont think bones tucked under a bush could be recognized by software or eye in an aerial captured image. They may have also been covered or wrapped. The analysts were probably focused west of oak beach, over examinig sticks, or they saw the remains and mic'd em etc for surveillance and were waiting, hopefully they are that good.
I agree...I do think police were more focused on searching west where the other remains were found.
your post has been on my mind for a while & tonight I searched & found the Newsday video of the Black Hawk helicopter here:
http://www.newsday.com/video/helicopter-search-1.2825326
Per the report, the helicopter started in the eastern side of Oak Beach and then went west to Gilgo Beach....and sure nuff, the helicopter did fly over the marsh & I got a screen capture here that shows the helicopter in relation to the gate. (the Oak Beach sign is perpendicular to the gate)
Then I have a screen capture of the Charlie Hannon PI video showing the relation of the sign to the gate that can be seen in the 1st screen capture and then finally, a Bing map screen capture of the gate.
So, why didn't that helicopter see her remains, etc back in April 2011??? I am curious though, how do you know the marsh was previously searched on foot? Is there a report?
The News12 footage is the best evidence that the special camera was directly over the location in question on April 18, 2011. If her body was there on that day, there is absolutely no question in my mind that it would have been found! Based on the FBI data, they came up with 11 points of interest less than 1/4 mile North of this location. If Shannan was there on 4/18/11, they would have received a BIG HIT in that location! They didn't, which can only mean one thing, she wasn't there.
Finding remains
(high tech)
I hear what you are saying, but I don't hear any reasoning. I am not saying one way or the other that she was certainly there or not, but from a technology standpoint, I don't think you could see bones clearly when they are amongst branches.
If there was decomp happening you could detect chemicals, but I don't think there was anything but bones at that point. In my opinion it doesn't matter what technology you are using, x-ray, hyper-spectral, radar, superman vision, a bone wrapped in burlap in a thicket of branches is no different than a branch........... Of course as I'm saying this it dawns on me that the metal plate could be detectable...but that close to the parkway could you decipher that plate from any number of small pieces of metal that have flown into the brush from decades of cars flying by? nuts, bolts, cans, lighters, ....
* I am not an expert on this stuff, just my best guess.
I also don't think they would need to re-examine the imagery because if she had decomposed there they could tell by examining the ground. Of course they would still look back that the imagery, but I don't think that is where the definitive answer comes from.
(low tech)
That being said, if we weren't being distract by gadgetry might we be doing a better job of old school detective work? For instance, the G4 and some of the other remains had been discarded on the north side of ocean parkway near gilgo, and the save the beaches organization performs an annual cleanup of the bayside of the island around there. So how is it this group never stumbled upon the human remains? I haven't gone full force into this question, but is it possible that the SK knows exactly what area the group cleans and what area they don't? Well we know who spearheads the beach cleanup effort, and we know her husband would likely know what area is scoured and what area isn't.
truthspider,
The camera wasn't looking for bones. It was looking for HUMAN SKIN!
http://www.igarss08.org/Abstracts/pdfs/3540.pdf
The 11 "hits" just north of that area were probably from duck hunters in that area rubbing up against the bramble and leaving behind traces of their skin. Just speculation on my part but I've read a lot of material on the internet and this is what I've come up with.
gross. I don't have time to read that now, but would there really be any skin left what so ever after an entire summer? I would think that would all be decomposed.
Plus, the summer of 2010 and then again in 2011 were especially hot in the mid-Atlantic. I know they were for us in DC, the 2 hottest summers on record. I can't imagine it being much different in NY..maybe a few degrees cooler on most days. Still you're talking about day after day of 90+ degree weather. Even near the beach probably in the very high 80s.
Shannan's remains were NOT found 100 Yards off the Ocean Parkway. They were found only 100 FEET off the parkway!