Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by Brini, Oct 9, 2009.
Just another look at the state's motion.
I read the caption too fast, missed the colon and thought the prosecutors were actually showing us who dumped Caylee.
I thought there was botanical/entomological evidence that proved Caylee had been there since June.
Next week, it has just been released to the Defense.
Yeah, but the defense keeps publicly floating the thought that someone else dumped her. It's another instance of the prosecution having to tell the defense to put up or shut up.
ETA: it appears that this time the S.A. wants names and details, not just the defense claim they made last month. Heh.
OK...but I would still think...scientifically...that the botanical/entomological evidence would trump anything the defense wants to "float." AND...I thought we saw this evidence months ago.....am I correct?
Those reports have just been given to the defense. Hopefully we'll be able to see the results in the next couple of weeks.
You are correct. You know how the defense and the A's like to do what they can to taint the jury pool. I think asking for specific details is the SA's response to BC's fiasco of a duct tape presser where he was trying to point away from KC. BC said he wanted to do what he could to get that information out so KC could have a fair trial. I can't remember his exact statement, but he might as well been saying he was speaking to the jury pool.
Separate names with a comma.