Discussion in 'Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias' started by LambChop, Jan 13, 2015.
Please continue posting here today. :tyou:
Quote Originally Posted by ohreally View Post
IIRC the original tweets said that the cost of the transcripts was going to be $400. There wasn't any mention of how many pages, just the cost. AZlawyer even posted that she had paid up to eight dollars per page. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the first afternoon of tweets never mentioned 400 pages only the cost of $400.
IMO there is no way JSS is going to redaction any of the testimony. She would be caught so fast and be in big trouble. All it would take is for Juan to ask Jodi one question about her secret testimony that is not found in the transcripts and media lawyers would be all over it.
I could be wrong, but I haven't seen any tweets about there ever being 400 pages.
Beth's video blog last night said the cost is now $576 for "expedited" transcripts. The media lawyer will get free copies for the parties he represents and Beth was hopeful she might get a discounted price from him. The $576 goes to the court reporter, not the court and iirc she said its under 200 pages
There is no court today---correct?
No court. Waiting on release of the transcripts of JA's testimony.
Good morning Lamb Chop. Hope4more asked on last thread if we will have a thread for discussion of transcript only? Or will we just discuss it all here since this isn't a trial day? Thank you.
Also, can we post snippets of what BK will post on her site or no?
I'll shamelessly rely on you lovely people to summarize that transcript for me or just type about the highlights. I have about 200 pages to read for exams and sadly those are a tad bit (just a little bit ) more important than JA's BS.
Thank you in advance!
There is a thread set up all ready but I am on iPad and cannot copy and paste the link....sorry.
hopefully soon we will all be like :yesss:
:findinglink: reading the transcripts
:silly: she said what?!?
I finally figured out who Juan Martinez reminds me of.
The late great basketball coach Jimmy Valvano.
These transcripts will be in the public domain.
They'll begin showing up as .pdf files on Scribd, news websites, and other document servers across the Internet shortly after release.
I have a separate thread for the transcript discussions because who knew there would be no court today. So I will open that up and for today you can discuss in both threads.
its 2pm here...im fed up waiting for these transcripts already :floorlaugh:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-Testimony-of-Jodi-Arias&highlight=jodi+arias ... JA testimony transcriptions discussion thread
I agree that Demarte will be the saving grace for the State. She will present her testimony with utmost clarity and brevity-what a contrast considering the haphazard and farcical evidence presented by the Defense.
Dr. Janeen DeMarte during guilt phase re Dr. Samuels conclusions:
Here's why you shouldn't be worried about Melendez' testimony that he found no viruses:
The virus showed up as pornographic links in the registry. As we know, either he didn't look there or what he found there was not important to him. The defense still had this information on their 2009 image and still chose not to pursue it. It was there. Dworkin did not say there was a virus either.
Travis didnt have a virus. His computer was being attacked and the anti virus software was quarantine-ing it and sending it somewhere else. Travis probably didn't even know these attacks were happening. Or there was a virus causing pop ups and it was cleaned up. Jodi said he had a virus. She said there were little bugs crawling all over his screen. She said the CD wouldn't play because of a virus which doesn't make sense. But that wasn't even true. There were some urls in his registry. His computer was otherwise fine. The virus was not active. So she's still a liar.
It's a minor inconsistency. Jodi was not convicted because she said there was a virus on his computer and they said there wasn't. Nor was that the sole reason she was deemed a liar. The gas can evidence pretty much took care of that. She is a liar.
Anyone else prepared for disappointment when these transcripts are released?
I can just imagine all the 'good' stuff totally redacted and it only showing filler words like 'the' or 'and' or 'or'.
(I'm in a snotty mood today I guess)
I bet TA's computer barely figured in the first jury's discussions. I wonder if those jurors are precluded from publicly speaking about those deliberations now? Once a verdict is given, I'm pretty sure the lawyers are allowed to speak with any jurors willing to talk.
Thanks everyone who posted such kind words yesterday! "Cleaning my toaster" came from a running conversation here back in NovemberI don't remember who originally brought it up, or even why. I like the vortex here.
Twitter, though... I'm sorry. I've tried a number of ways to automatically collect relevant Tweets, but I am not a data scientist. I just haven't got time to sort through Twitter on most days. There's a good reason many workplaces won't let employees get to Twitter from work.
Looking forward to reading what everyone here has to say about the secret testimony later on!