- Oct 10, 2004
- Reaction score
That's fine, but a statement such as this in the beginning, which complies with all the rules you cited and does not introduce anything new or contradictory, can serve to orient the jury and put them in a better position to be vigilant in their objectivity.
I'd prefer to see limits on "evidence" completely uncorroborated and born from the mind of a known pathological liar and convicted murderer which serves to just continue to revictimize their victim ever been allowed. Sorry no time to edit that as I'm running out the door in a few min.