Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Way to go Willmott. Your own question will now have the jury wondering if the killer really did re-write parts of her journal after the murder.Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 14s 14 seconds ago
Geffner says no way she re wrote journals after she killed Travis or she would have added the DV #jodiarias #3tvarias
Nash, we are just getting tweets of the questions. Beth Karas has them in detail. I don't think they are good for the prosecution. Yes, the jury is sharp. And Juan can clear some things up. But as of right now, IMO, this jury is hung.This is my favorite batch of questions ever, even from the last trial. They want to nail him down to an answer and he's stumbling without the defense lawyer to guide him how to answer. Geff in big big trouble lol
On Beth's site, there were 31 very detailed questions and the jury asked some good questions. Unfortunately, some of them believe the defense. Hope Juan can make them see the truth and see Jodi for what she really is.
What a fool. It wasn't her planned defense at the time. In fact, she didn't plan on needing a defense at the time. Everything she wrote was glowing about Travis because there's no way SHE had any reason to kill him right?
MOO
Apparently. Isn't that interesting? And now we hear that she moved in with Matt in between Palm Desert and moving to Mesa (while she was briefly in Big Sur). I have a much better understanding of good ol' Matt now, and why we will NEVER hear from him. He was in this up to his eyeballs with her. She phoned him from Hoover Dam, as well.
Is it possible JA IS going to testify tonight due to the public interest dropping off in the evening time when things need to be done. I'm wondering if it is a pretty good strategy for them considering she doesn't want to be seen testifying. Maybe they think they are pulling the wool over the eyes of those that have NEVER seen them go past 4, much less 8pm.
Not if it didn't occur to her until she was in jail with a lot of women who were actually abused to learn from.
Nash, we are just getting tweets of the questions. Beth Karas has them in detail. I don't think they are good for the prosecution. Yes, the jury is sharp. And Juan can clear some things up. But as of right now, IMO, this jury is hung.
How could she even say that? I seriously wonder about her lately.
Remember folks- she thought Nurmi had a strong case for prosecutorial misconduct with the computer crap.
Quote Originally Posted by Curious in Indiana View Post
On Beth's site, there were 31 very detailed questions and the jury asked some good questions. Unfortunately, some of them believe the defense. Hope Juan can make them see the truth and see Jodi for what she really is.
How could she even say that? I seriously wonder about her lately.
Remember folks- she thought Nurmi had a strong case for prosecutorial misconduct with the computer crap.
Nash, we are just getting tweets of the questions. Beth Karas has them in detail. I don't think they are good for the prosecution. Yes, the jury is sharp. And Juan can clear some things up. But as of right now, IMO, this jury is hung.
But she isn't commenting. She only wrote down the questions and the answers. You don't have the full picture. Thank JSS.Beth lost me with bryan n. Some of her opinions or insights are way out there. I love her reporting but i think she's a bit rusty seeing it from jurors perspective