http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0902/27/ijvm.01.html
The above link is of the JVM show that aired on 27 FEB 09. Comments snipped are from JVM and CAPTAIN DICK SCHAULAND, PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF`S OFFICE the snippets only relate to RC. His entire interview that was given by phone can be seen at the link.
(sorry for the length of this post but I didn't want to edit in order to preserve context)
"VELEZ-MITCHELL: In terms of the family, why the re-interviews over and over again of Misty and Ron and why haven`t any of the immediate family members been excluded as suspects at this point?
SHAULAND: Well, nobody has been excluded as a suspect because we just don`t know what happened to Haleigh. We don`t know anything about her whereabouts. As you can well imagine, somewhere down the line when all likelihood we`ve got a crime involved in the disappearance of Haleigh.
And so we are trying to keep the criminal investigation alive and we`ve not ruled out anybody because we don`t know what the crime is at this point.
VELEZ-MITCHELL: I guess --
SHAULAND: As far as --
VELEZ-MITCHELL: Just to follow up on that, Captain, quite often in other criminal cases, let`s say when a woman is murdered, usually immediately police look at the significant other, the husband or boyfriend.
And then as his alibi is verified and they find out yes, he was spotted at work at the time, and that person is formally excluded as a suspect, that`s what I`m talking about.
Obviously, for example, Ron`s alibi was that he was at work. And that`s firm, right?
SHAULAND: That`s correct. That is his alibi and he was at work. We were able to check that. However, again we don`t know what happened to Haleigh and we don`t when it happened."
What do you all make of that comment by the CPT?
what i make of it is that they are saying Ron's presence at work that night doesn't necessarily absolve him from involvement. Perhaps he went in late, left early or took a long lunch break?? we don't know this, but obviously if the alibi were iron tight, he'd be cleared. Perhaps working nights, he wouldn't have been seen for significant amounts of time... and wouldn't have been missed if he did leave for any amount of time?
also, they are saying they don't know the exact nature of the crime (abduction by stranger or relative, death, or injury inside the home), they obviously don't know when anything happened, and they aren't using Misty's timeline.