Spellbound
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 37,304
Re BBM
Exactly. He got exactly what he wanted for his defense which is one of his rights.
His own original attorneys I am sure tried to talk him out of it and he elected to do it his way. So he got a fair trial exactly what he wanted in his way.
If he does not like the verdict then that is just too bad.
The verdict is just the final result of a trial and should have no bearing on whether he got a fair trial which he did IMO.
Unless there was some grave error somewhere along the way that is identified then I see no reason a second chance should be given to him.
He sure didnt give his victims any second chances so IMO the court should not give him second chances just because he does not like the verdict.
This is interesting in his statements. He is basically telling us that he could kill people again.
I think the jury got it right. Protect society from this evil person.
""You may remember in my confession I said I had to do it. I guess that's not really true. I didn't have to do it, no one made me do it. What I meant when I said that was I felt like I had to do it and I still feel like I had to do it."
http://www.live5news.com/story/34222606/live-coverage-jury-sentences-dylann-roof-to-death
I agree with both your posts, Hatfield. Well said. There is no reason to redo a trial, and I doubt this judge will give it any merit. If I recall correctly, the judge is giving Roof until tomorrow morning to reconsider his request. Perhaps it coudl have some detrimental effect on any future appeals if he allows the motion, even though it will be denied?
Are they going to release the trial (all the infomration>)now or hold off until the state one- which IMO a further waste of money
Kinda surprised it seems like people are surprised?
I am not sure how much will be released until after the state trial. Some will get released fairly soon, I think.