mystery_cat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2023
- Messages
- 204
- Reaction score
- 2,395
Chapman states he was not made aware of any tire impressions made down the driveway when asked by DH.
Did Chapman give a specific location in Hampton County?Chapman just said Paul's truck was later located in Hampton County - I'm curious as to the reasoning for Paul's truck being there. Just a thought - I can see DH jumping on the fact that Paul's truck wasn't at the scene.
He mentioned it being off a highway, but I didn't hear which one.Did Chapman give a specific location in Hampton County?
Perhaps he was upset with his wife. She was leaving him, was preparing for a divorce. Spouses often turn that way once the divorce talk begins, especially if major money problems are involved.
MOO I think AM checked it and it was locked. He couldn't get in. I think he just tossed back on Paul. (Instead of trying to stick it back in his pocket).Interesting idea. But if the phone had incriminating evidence, why leave it? Why not dispose of it? I wonder if the phone was checked for fingerprints.
I've heard that too, but I don't think it was real.During 911 call I was waiting to hear AM reference Paul...something like "Paul why did you get into this" ...or words similar. I know I have heard that before when listening to 911 call! I didn't hear it today.
Something's fishy here IMO. I find it strange that AM told authorities that he doesn't know who was threatening Paul, but Buster did.Maybe this is what Buster will testify to if called…
Murdaugh tells the dispatcher he doesn't know who has been threatening his son Paul, but his other son, Buster, does know.
Per the below article, maybe Paul drove his truck to his grandparent's home in Almeda (which is in Hampton County), switched into his uncle's truck there, and drove his uncle's truck to Moselle?Chapman just said Paul's truck was later located in Hampton County - I'm curious as to the reasoning for Paul's truck being there. Just a thought - I can see DH jumping on the fact that Paul's truck wasn't at the scene.
This is a guy who, after his longtime housekeeper Gloria Satterfield died on his property from some bizarre "accident," then stole settlement money from her sons, one of whom was disabled. So yeah, my rational mind absolutely believed he could kill those who were in his way.For me, its more a feeling of "I can't believe he did this". My rational mind tells me he probably did do this, but my empathetic mind cannot grasp how anyone could do this to anyone, let alone their son and wife. JMO
Well AM thought ahead of time not to have his phone down at the kennels. That sounds premeditated to me.These are my notes on the timeline from the prosecution's opening statement, which he said is backed up by phone data. If he is correct, it is very damning.
8:15 p.m Maggie arrived at house, and Paul was already at the house.
Alex said they ate dinner together, confirmed by stomach contents of victims.
8:30 p.m. Paul heads to the kennels.
8:44:55 p.m. Paul records a video to send to a friend. Witnesses have identified voices heard on the video as Paul, Maggie and Alex.
8:49:01 p.m. Paul's phone goes silent.
8:49:31 p.m. Maggie's phone goes silent.
Between 8:09 p.m. and 9:02 p.m. Alex’s phone didn’t have much activity, it was not at the kennels.
9:02 p.m. Alex calls Maggie's phone
9:06 p.m. Alex calls Maggie's phone again, and starts his car.
Alex texts Maggie that he's going to check on his mom at Alameda.
Alex drives to mom’s, he makes more calls on the drive.
Alex is at mom’s for 20 minutes
9:44 p.m., he leaves and heads back home. He makes more calls on the drive back.
10:01 p.m. Alex is back home.
10:06 p.m. Alex calls 911.
RbbmThese are my notes on the timeline from the prosecution's opening statement, which he said is backed up by phone data. If he is correct, it is very damning.
8:15 p.m Maggie arrived at house, and Paul was already at the house.
Alex said they ate dinner together, confirmed by stomach contents of victims.
8:30 p.m. Paul heads to the kennels.
8:44:55 p.m. Paul records a video to send to a friend. Witnesses have identified voices heard on the video as Paul, Maggie and Alex.
8:49:01 p.m. Paul's phone goes silent.
8:49:31 p.m. Maggie's phone goes silent.
Between 8:09 p.m. and 9:02 p.m. Alex’s phone didn’t have much activity, it was not at the kennels.
9:02 p.m. Alex calls Maggie's phone
9:06 p.m. Alex calls Maggie's phone again, and starts his car.
Alex texts Maggie that he's going to check on his mom at Alameda.
Alex drives to mom’s, he makes more calls on the drive.
Alex is at mom’s for 20 minutes
9:44 p.m., he leaves and heads back home. He makes more calls on the drive back.
10:01 p.m. Alex is back home.
10:06 p.m. Alex calls 911.
Yup like a teen kegger took place.DH is really trying to impress upon the jury that the crime scene was not maintained well, allowing for the contamination/destruction of evidence.
Between this case and the one in Idaho, rural Ohio looks better and better.Harpo is making a point about the way they handled parts of the crime scene. As local/county PD, they need to check to see if anyone is alive and if the scene is secured. Otherwise, wait for SLED to arrive and process the crime scene, and they should be prepared to respond quickly with all the experts and equipment they need. They shouldn't have even allowed EMS to take the bodies until after SLED released them. SLED agents would have been the ones to enter the crime scene after dressing in boots, coveralls, etc. to avoid contamination.
Basing this on how the crime scenes were handled by LE for the Rhoden Family murders in Pike County, OH.
![]()
BCI agents testify as Pike County massacre trial enters second week
The murder trial of George Wagner IV is entering its second week of testionywww.fox19.com