Cindizzi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 7,404
- Reaction score
- 112,748
AM offers a reason in the second video below.Help me, why did AM go to the kennels? I mean what excuse did he give????
Maggie messes around with the dogs, hiuse was dark so..... suddenly he wanted to ... what? ... mess around with the dogs?
Why shouldn't he assume MM had turned in, called it a night? Why did he need to locate her at all? And if she was out, why not plop down on his imaginary couch in his perfect-marriage house of make-believe and wait for her to return?
Erm, did he have a premonition she needed looking for?
So not credible.
JMO
This is really interesting….sounds like he still had blood on him when he got into the vehicle
I contend that's no answer!!!!AM offers a reason in the second video below.
He need to give a reason his fingerprints are all over Paul's phone!
^^bbmDid LE ask him if he washed off after he allegedly did that? That would be a normal question to ask since LE had been told he had gone up to the house to get a gun. JMO.
I'm guessing this has already been discussed, but I'm curious ... was Paul shot while he was in the shed, possibly trying to hide or get away from the shooter?
NY Post
He's NOT. He emulates what he thinks he's supposed to look like . <modsnip>I'm sorry - I'm not buying this whole "AM is genuinely upset thing". I just watched his reaction to PM's shoes being shown as they were entered into evidence. MOO
What?? Is the first time SLED searched the Moselle residence three months after the murders??
I thought the same when I first saw this photoWhose bare legs are those in the 2nd image? Sort of frightening looking. Perhaps it is a mannequin? Folks who hunt may possess duck decoys but what explains the reason for a mannequin being in this room? I thought, at first, it was PM.
View attachment 398245
TIA