Hello All, I've been lurking here for a few weeks, and have found your discussions enlightening. However, out of all the theories and evidence discussed, I have found one subject seriously discounted- and that is the DNA evidence. From what I have read, many of you think the DNA in the panties could come from a factory worker who sneezed- a very plausible explanation. Except for the fact that the panty DNA MATCHED the DNA under her fingernails. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/12/16/48hours/main661569.shtml Therefore, it doesn't really make sense that the DNA sample is weak, tainted, or otherwise unusable, because they had enough to match it. It also doesn't make sense that the panty DNA came from a sneeze at the factory- because how would it end up under her nails? I suppose it is possible that the Ramsey's knew the killer, or knew information about the crime. However, I believe the evidence speaks for itself as to who assaulted/killed her. It wasn't them. Please feel free to refute.