Here's the affidavit filed in support of the search warrant to search Connie Akers home (sorry I don't know how to post it as a hyper link directly to web page) but its on
www.wset.com under News Links: Read: Search Warrant Affidavit.
http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/wset/SKMBT_60115071517110.pdf
According to the Affidavit Connie Akers told LE, when Lloyd showed up with the duffel bags in the spring of 1975 at her home on Taylor Mountain Road, he had a female companion with him.
Thanks for posting the link to the affidavit in support of the search warrant.
New information clearing added by the affidavit is
1) The police failed to identify the Long-hair-man in 1975. Assuming Lloyd is the long-hair-man, this looks like very bad police work to me. I would have excused the police if they identified Lloyd as the long-hair man, who was talking to them a week later, but passed him over because in 1975 he was just a two-bit juvenile deliquescent. Since Lloyd hung out at Wheaton Plaza, I would guess that canvassing mall regulars would lead to several people identifying him, if not by name, but at a minimum was a mall regular.
2) As I previously thought, the information not known to the general public was an item of clothing, a flowered colored shirt. Just knowing that the one of the sisters was wearing a flower either means the information was obtained by seeing the girls as everyone one who saw them that day did, or acquiring the information secondhand via gossip. I would hope that the police passed over Lloyds early statements in 1975 because many people in Wheaton had this "not known to the general public information"
3) Contrary to my previous thoughts, Lloyd approached the mall security to offer information on the crime. I previously thought that Lloyd was likely bragging that he knew what happened to his fellow friends at the mall (who could have easily identified him as the long-hair man) and these people informed mall security.
4) Lloyd said he BELEIVED they were "abducted, raped and burned up," but he did not claim to to have done it himself. Many people here (not me) and perhaps even the police believe the girls were "abducted, raped and burned up;" this does not make the people here, Lloyd or the police guilty of murder. (My GUESS is that the girls were murdered in a botched unlawful seduction (statutory rape), but not abducted or forcefully raped.)
5) Lloyd did show up one time in 1975 with a female companion (perhaps the pregnant Helen Craver he was dating and later married), and he did show up one time in 1975 with two bloody duffel bags, but it's never stated the two times were the same time. If the female companion and duffel bags (perhaps containing bodies) were on the SAME trip, well I guess Helen Craver could have been out of the loop and not know what Lloyd was up to, but it's possible she either knowingly or unknowingly (thinking it was bad hamburger meat) helped Lloyd dispose of the evidence.
6.) There are more details about Lloyd's story about his uncle, which may or may not include details such as locked rooms in basement which have been disputed by others who lived in the house.
7.) Henry Parker is the source of family conversations of Lloyd running from the police with two girls. But Henry Parker in a news interview fulling denies any knowledge at the time of the duffel bags and clearly states he would not be involved in any way with murder of two girls. These two statements are both true only if the conversation about the two girls was after the burning of the duffel bags.
