Discussion in 'Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias' started by LambChop, Feb 9, 2015.
Please continue your discussions here.
Thank you Lambie. For everything...
One more on Sechrest, dated 2011:
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In FDCO 20110915911
[h=5]816 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2011)[/h]
[h=4]Ricky David SECHREST, Petitioner, v. Renee BAKER, et al., Respondents.[/h][h=5]United States District Court, D. Nevada.[/h][h=5]September 13, 2011.[/h]
Michael Pescetta, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner.
[/h][h=5]David K. Neidert, Nevada Attorney General, Reno, NV, for Respondents.
Hi! O/T. I am having problems with virus' on my computer. I bought it used. DONT.. I wont be around much to post but I will try to read.
I hope the S. Court does something about ending this :trainwreck: . Zuri I am so sorry for your baby horse. She is romping in Gods fields
of clover now. Take care sweetie :loveyou:
In regards to one of the juror questions:
Question: Can the body have reactions to certain stimuli that triggers emotions to a memory?
Answer: Yes--there could be a physiological reaction.
This makes me think that at least one juror is trying to figure out why she killed Travis. As with a lot (if not all) of us have wondered, why did she do it? We have had years to process and digest the murder to understand that CMJA had evil intentions when it came to TA, and there really is no logical reason for what she did.
A lot, if not all, of these jurors probably did not know all of the gory details of this trial, and are in the stage of "Why would a person do this?" and are thinking that perhaps something TA did/said that day triggered some emotional event from her past and she snapped. I know I read a lot of people's theories on that in the first trial.
This is what I think inspired this particular question.
I take all the juror's questions as someone trying to process why this happened, and if they can trust JD to align themselves with her diagnosis and professional opinion.
Try these two sites to help remove them. I've had success with them both.
The best virus program that I've found is a free one. AVG.com. They have protected me better than McAfee ever did.
And to combat malware, use malwarebytes.com.
Both are free and both do a superb job in removing and protecting your computer.
Sorry you have a virus, but it can be fixed!
I just got home and starting to catch up reading upstream. I saw the questions, and that specific one I highlighted to comment on. SMH, ya never know.... but I had same reaction you did.
As to viruses... last year in January, I had a blue screen virus as did many others here. I am a luddite, and don't know how I figured it out...but I downloaded Kapersky on a flash drive from my nook, then put the flash drive in my computer and did a safe start, and VOILA! Removed it. It was a REALLY NASTY one. AVG did not remove or protect from it. Scanning with malwarebytes is good too. Not sure if they have the same thing as Kapersky for removal.... others may know best.
ETA: Here is the link for the virus removal (does trojans and other stuff too) http://www.kaspersky.com/antivirus-removal-tool?form=1
or google Kapersky virus removal tool if you feel more comfortable
I found this! http://youtu.be/91szLp8Vhrw
As several posters have stated here on the previous and now closed sidebar thread, as well as the trial thread, I am also concerned with some of the jurors questions. I hope they don't indicate what I am afraid they indicate. Perhaps there's a chance that they are only attempting to verify. That's really all I feel I can say at this point. And, hey everyone, Love you all. :loveyou:
If you have severe problems, such as browser hijack, bad trojans etc. you can use http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/. This is a modded site that assigns your case to a member that will walk you thru fixes - maybe three or more steps. You may need a functioning computer to be able to work with this site if you can't get online w/ the infected machine. I have rescued machines that no common virus scanner could touch.
The juror question I found suspect was about the passwords. Did they completely miss the email/IM where Travis said he kept changing them and CMJA worked them out?
I'm now thinking life with this jury. It seems they've gone all "mental illness!!!!! She knows not what she does!!!!" :-(
I think once JM ties everything together brilliantly we'll have nothing to fear.
I hope so. I've had to fight all my life to say that just because I've got a mental illness I'm not a nutter and then we get this person and her DT acting like we all are.
Oh and her suicidal tendencies! GAH! I first tried to kill myself when I was eight years old. Did I tell anyone before hand? No I did not. In my experience people who want to commit suicide don't go around telling everyone about it. That's why, when one does or attempts it you get the world and his wife saying "OMG, I had no idea!"
My children's uncle on their dad's side used to say that all the time when he wanted food/money/booze off his mother and she was so scared he'd do something she'd supply him with what he wanted. I said to her once "Has he ever attempted or does he just say it?" and she said "Oh no, he's never done anything but he would if I didn't help him". Bah!
Good morning! Yes or No, I think I awoke before you did. How about that.
I am going to help today with preschool so I had to awake early. If you see yesterday's write up by Paul Sanders about the trial, please post it. I am anxious to read his thoughts about the testimony.
Have a great day everyone. I am anxious to see what the AZ supremes rules also!
Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
2/9/2015 012 - ME: Trial - Party (001) 2/9/2015
2/7/2015 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 2/9/2015
NOTE: MOTION FOR MISTRIAL; PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT THAT OCCURRED DURING THE CROSS EXAMINATION OF DR. ROBERT GEFFNER (SUPPLEMENTAL RELATED TO MISCONDUCT THAT OCCURRED ON JANUARY 26, 2015)
MOTION FOR MISTRIAL; PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT THAT OCCURRED DURING THE CROSS EXAMINATION OF DR. ROBERT GEFFNER (SUPPLEMENTAL RELATED TO MISCONDUCT THAT OCCURRED ON JANUARY 26, 2015)
Jodi Arias sentencing retrial: jurors questioned by Judge Stephens (short clip included)
The Stabby Arias Penalty Phase Re-Trial -The OMG Edition
Lets see. I cannot copy and paste from the PDF so, I will just say this is kind of funny. Why? Well, Nurmi was all yelly and screamy yesterday and calling Dr Demarte, Dr. Death AGAIN. I really would love to see Nurmi flailing his arms all over the place. That must of been a site.
Yes, Juan called Witness 1 by his name, but Witness 1 put his name out there FIRST.
Geffner did lead Arias in getting the scores that she got. There were notes in the margin of the test. Juan just pointed that all out. The defense team loves to accuse Juan of things THEY have done and I don't see him crying about it. Seems like just a waste of time. They way I have see it. The defense has done much worse things in this trial. Since Arias has had BPD for quite some time now, which includes the 1st trial, there is absolutely no good reason why she could not go back on the stand. More hissy fits from Arias and her Defense.
If I recall correctly, Geffner also said Witness 1 name. Oops
Here you go, my dear: :blowkiss:
The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial: A Jurors Perspective
by The 13th Juror MD
JE NE SUIS PAS LADY JUSTICE
This is interesting. Could this be why the jurors were called in 1 by 1. Sorry it just went poof but here is the clip and the rest can be found on JA hashtag.
When clicking the link, if it does not work: Copy/paste it into browser window, but put the S/ at the end of status and it should work
link to the juror video