While I'm glad we finally have some names and faces that are being questioned in the Grand Jury, I wouldn't put a lot of hope in charges being filed. There is an unsolved murder in the small town next to where I live (it is listed on the OSBI's web page as unsolved murder). A woman was found shot numerous times in her back yard in broad daylight about 12 years ago. A grand jury was called to really question her boyfriend at the time (a past county commissioner who served time in federal prison for the county commissioner scandal of the 1980's). He was later convicted for lying to the Grand Jury about owning a gun when he said he didn't own a gun. Other than that.... the crime is still unsolved. I think the prosecutor called the grand jury with the OSBI's input to try to put some pressure on these witnesses. Their stories just don't jive for some reason!
That is another great tool of the Grand Jury...while a witness or suspicious person may lie to LE or refuse to talk with them answering all of their questions, they cannot lie under oath in a GJ and they cannot refuse to testify before one.
It is a great way to close in and ask very pertinent questions that may have gone unanswered in interviews with LE. For example: If anyone of these witnesses does have access to a .40 caliber Glock but deny it on the stand, then OSBI may already have knowledge that they indeed had access. Therefore; they can arrest them for lying about that or anything else that they swore to in their GJ testimony that was not truthful.
So imo OSBI is doing the correct thing by using this method as an investigative tool so that everyone pertinent is thoroughly interrogated and believe me these jurors are going to be asking more and more questions. Imo, they will be calling back previous witnesses to further ask questions of them.
imoo