Source: Casey's Attorney Marketing Photos To Media

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Roze said:
If I were the media here's the pic that I would be paying big money for -- KC in her cell. I would go after the shot of her eating cheese snacks whilst sitting on the crapper. That's the real money shot. I hope the defense is listening.
Click to expand...


:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:


Post of the day, Roze!
 
Funny how this bit of news came out just as news of the memorial came out.
 
:mad::mad::mad::mad:
bunnyphoenix1 said:
I think the way they are probably getting around it is that the As sell the pics, then give the money to JB. I think as long as they are not charged with a crime related to Caylee, they can sell pretty much anything they want and do what they want with the money. Maybe that's what the "forever in our hearts" bracelets are for too. Because they couldn't be to raise funds to find Caylee anymore.
Click to expand...


aS VULGAR AS THE A FAMILY PROVES TO BE..SELLING PHOTOS OF A DEAD cAYLEE WOULD BE JUST FINE WITH ALL OF THE A'S:mad::mad::mad:
 
this is just typical of what we've all come to know and expect from this revolting family and their vile defenders...:furious:
 
bunnyphoenix1 said:
Diversion maybe?? Do we know if the date is still tentative?
Click to expand...

I think it's been finalized.

Oh - I get it. A little slow tonight - sorry. I have a hard time grasping how twisted that crew really is.

This is for Caylee :blowkiss: I wish she had a better chance here on Earth.
 
MyTinkieGirl said:
IMO...this just seems like a diversion from all the other kaka going on with the defense....like "will the real TB please stand up"....a family in Ct, no a family in Tx is paying for the PR firm....Casey's legal bills are being paid by an "anonymous" benefactor as per JB at one time....TB works for JB, yet doesn't speak for him.....I could go on ad naseum. Me thinks they need to try to get ONE story and stick with it. The defense is tryin to blow smoke because EVERYONE is starting to look into the money trail.
Click to expand...
I ABSOLUTELY agree with you.
 
radio said:
Casey Anthony owns the image of her daughter.
If her parents took pics and then try to sell them,
well, they could actually be sued. Casey owns Caylee's
image. Period.
Click to expand...

I'm far from an expert on this, but she doesn't own the image of her daughter. Whoever took the pictures owns them...unless that automatic copywrite was relinquished in some fashion (given away, sold, etc).

Edit: I'm a (very, lol) amateur photographer and I've looked into copywrite before.

Edit: Here are some links:
http://www.photolaw.net/faq.html
http://www.whatiscopyright.org/
http://www.copyright.gov/
 
Isn't is possible that she has a separate web account with pictures, including the deleted ones prior to arrest. She could have transferred the pictures to the account, not told CA or GA so they would have lost the ability to view pictures. All she needed to do was tell JB which site the pictures are at, given him the user name and password. That way she still had access to pictures and deny the CA & GA from ever seeing them again.
 
I'm so disgusted with the whole bottom feeding bunch, but hoping as long as they are shopping these pics, that they make a bundle and the judge orders it all to go to ZFG. That would be a hoot. :woohoo:
 
Diamond said:
I'm far from an expert on this, but she doesn't own the image of her daughter. Whoever took the pictures owns them...unless that automatic copywrite was relinquished in some fashion (given away, sold, etc).

Edit: I'm a (very, lol) amateur photographer and I've looked into copywrite before.

Edit: Here are some links:
http://www.photolaw.net/faq.html
http://www.whatiscopyright.org/
http://www.copyright.gov/
Click to expand...

I agree with this post, the photographer/filmographer owns all rights. Sometimes the subjects, if they have not signed a model's release form or something, can cause problems, but as a general rule of thumb, the photographer owns the photo. You do not 'own' the image of your children.
 
LancelotLink said:
But didn't he just say he had no media deals whatsoever? Oh, wait...that was days ago...
Click to expand...

Right, the stories change whichever way the wind blows. I so wish this would go to trial fast and get them all out of our faces yesterday. I'm even SO tired of NG thinking CA isn't out there collecting or orchestrating any of this. I can't stand to hear her stick up for her any longer. I feel like dropping her an email. :bang:
 
IMO, they will not sell well. All the photos of KC and Caylee are online, even if they haven't been used in publications. Unless they have breaking news pics or something shocking, its worthless. IMO, not even the tabloids will bite. They are smarter than that.
 
Egoslayer said:
I agree with this post, the photographer/filmographer owns all rights. Sometimes the subjects, if they have not signed a model's release form or something, can cause problems, but as a general rule of thumb, the photographer owns the photo. You do not 'own' the image of your children.
Click to expand...

So people can trash our children if they choose?
 
radio said:
So people can trash our children if they choose?
Click to expand...

Harassment is a crime.

However .. if you post pictures of your children online, and then you find some forum copy pasting random genitals on your children's faces or something sick like that, you can't really stop them. I've had to deal with a family that had this happen to them. If you put your pictures online, anything can happen. There is a little girl with some disorder and her parents made her a website with pictures, and she was totally trashed. There's nothing you can do, that's why I'm never putting pictures of my children in a public online place. Stick with email, or make a private website imo.

EDIT:
If a stranger takes a picture of your child, you also have limited rights. Think of all those celebrity baby pictures. The parents don't want the pictures out there, but they have no choice. Photographer retains the right EVEN if it's a minor.
 
Egoslayer said:
Harassment is a crime.

However .. if you post pictures of your children online, and then you find some forum copy pasting random genitals on your children's faces or something sick like that, you can't really stop them. I've had to deal with a family that had this happen to them. If you put your pictures online, anything can happen. There is a little girl with some disorder and her parents made her a website with pictures, and she was totally trashed. There's nothing you can do, that's why I'm never putting pictures of my children in a public online place. Stick with email, or make a private website imo.
Click to expand...

Good post Ego!

I never post any personal pic online. Sometimes email with family only ... never even know about friends - ya know!!

Sorry for the family you worked with.
 
The only ones I put online are sober and decent looking. (like on facebook) and not too many either.


Anyway .. back to the case :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 195 more.
Total: 3,469 (members: 196, guests: 3,273)

Online statistics

Members online
196
Guests online
3,273
Total visitors
3,469
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,821
Messages
17,959,611
Members
228,621
Latest member
MaryEllen77
Back
Top