State v Bradley Cooper 03-30-2011

Discussion in 'Nancy Cooper' started by less0305, Mar 30, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. less0305

    less0305 The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember m

    Messages:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Setting up for today.
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - State Bradley Cooper
    1. cityslick
      Replies:
      1,645
      Views:
      129,772
    2. otto
      Replies:
      792
      Views:
      78,215
    3. gritguy
      Replies:
      590
      Views:
      58,965

  3. LaLaw2000

    LaLaw2000 Louisiana

    Messages:
    12,362
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thank you, less0305!
     
  4. cityslick

    cityslick New Member

    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd expect Kurtz to hammer him on the phone today. Hopefully he'll be better about asking questions or half the day will be objections and scolding by the judge.
     
  5. CrimeAddict

    CrimeAddict Member

    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    FBI? Forensic computer guy? Someone else on the stand I would assume the defense has a little more hammering with Det JY and then they are done. Crossing fingers!
     
  6. cityslick

    cityslick New Member

    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wonder if they'll put Daniels up before all that. I'm actually a little surprise they put the SBI/CCBI folks up before Det. Young.
     
  7. SleuthinNC

    SleuthinNC New Member

    Messages:
    1,338
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  8. Star12

    Star12 New Member

    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    why does the wral site say 'completed' for the cooper trial feed?

    oh, nm... i was just to early
     
  9. SleuthinNC

    SleuthinNC New Member

    Messages:
    1,338
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Does anybody know if the Live Feed link can be made into a Sticky or something? It doesn't seem to be changing from day to day.
     
  10. borndem

    borndem Anglophile & registered demwit

    Messages:
    11,084
    Likes Received:
    179
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I think it's gonna be a long day for young Young -- he was up there with the ADAs for, what, 3.5 days or so? It's blurring.... And, rightfully, the defense is entitled to their go at him.

    Let's just sit back and "enjoy..."

    Good Morning, all!:seeya:
     
  11. luckyme

    luckyme New Member

    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    im so happy ill get to see most of everything today. You guys did a great job yesterday. I kept checking in via my phone.
     
  12. LaLaw2000

    LaLaw2000 Louisiana

    Messages:
    12,362
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :seeya:
     
  13. hotpinkstef

    hotpinkstef New Member

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i have a big meeting so no live feed. but can check this board keep me up to date if you can. thank you so much
     
  14. lib's mom

    lib's mom New Member

    Messages:
    752
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm liking this Mr. Cummings! He's ready to climb into the octagon this morning!
     
  15. SleuthinNC

    SleuthinNC New Member

    Messages:
    1,338
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lol he got hard core didn't he!
     
  16. Cheyenne130

    Cheyenne130 New Member

    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Right now he's going over things that seem to have little or no significance like the receipt showing that he really did buy a drop cloth and he's moved on to the letters found in BC's closet asking if there is any indication of whether or not they were received by BC during his marriage. So far none are dated. I don't see how this is helping the defense except to focus again that BC kept these items for whatever reason.
     
  17. Cheyenne130

    Cheyenne130 New Member

    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Kurtz is stating evidence again, "He told you there was a third pair of running shoes." Objection. Sustained. Now going over the detectives notes showing "third pair of running shoes". Asked if he wrote that during the interview with BC. JY says "No Sir". Now Kurtz is irritated.
     
  18. Cheyenne130

    Cheyenne130 New Member

    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Make note of this all of you who will watch this later. It comes up in the first half hour. You might want to listen for yourself.
     
  19. cityslick

    cityslick New Member

    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree to an extent as far as no significance. I think of this type of questioning as damage control, trying to clean up what was said about this stuff in direct.
     
  20. CrimeAddict

    CrimeAddict Member

    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Kurtz is throwing a lot of ideas out there and not questioning JY, mostly just suggesting and stating things so the jury thinks they are fact.

    Oh Kurtz finally found a pair of sneakers that were showed purchased by athletes foot but never found...
     
  21. Cheyenne130

    Cheyenne130 New Member

    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From purchase records at Athlete's Foot there is a purchase of "Hurricane's". Det Young admits these shoes were never found. Continues that returns are not noted on the records so he would have no way of knowing if these shoes were purchased and then later returned.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice