State v Bradley Cooper 4-25-11

Discussion in 'Nancy Cooper' started by CrimeAddict, Apr 25, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CrimeAddict

    CrimeAddict Member

    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Good Morning..
    Not showing anyone started this thread yet.
    So far they are arguing against "Mr V" being introduced as a defense witness who was not on the list.
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - State Bradley Cooper
    1. cityslick
      Replies:
      1,645
      Views:
      129,914
    2. otto
      Replies:
      792
      Views:
      78,279
    3. gritguy
      Replies:
      590
      Views:
      59,005

  3. NCEast

    NCEast New Member

    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks for starting a new thread!
     
  4. NCEast

    NCEast New Member

    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh..........and good morning to all!
     
  5. Bottle Cap

    Bottle Cap New Member

    Messages:
    554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Morning - thank you! Any blow-by-blow commentary appreciated, can't watch at work.

    Mr V is phone expert? Google person?
     
  6. DogWood

    DogWood New Member

    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Mr. Masucci? Expert witness.

    Agrees with JW...

    Whoa.
     
  7. GhostCrab

    GhostCrab New Member

    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Fascinating argument going on right now about this new defense witness. If the judge does not allow him, this will probably be a big issue on appeal.
     
  8. fran

    fran Former Member

    Messages:
    32,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    FWIW and IMHO, I believe this def is trying to do the same thing the OJ def did, confuse the jurors with too much info.

    FACT is, BC is an expert and MOST LIKELY be able to have made the spoof call and IMHO, it's MORE LIKELY BC changed his computer files and NOT LE or the FBI or whoever.

    JMHO
    fran
     
  9. gritguy

    gritguy Verified Expert

    Messages:
    1,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You’re being an optimist and assuming conviction there. :rocker:

    Can’t see it; what’s the debate: 11th hour witness, defense not prepared as it should have been v. interests of justice?

    Unless the state can show prejudice by the late declaration of the witness, then let him in I’d say. The best counterargument is that JW stated on the stand that he was not a forensics expert so the D shouldn’t have been surprised he didn’t qualify as such. (All this assuming this expert is meant to testify on what JW could not).
     
  10. cassius

    cassius New Member

    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, it doesn't appear as though the interest of justice has been the polar star guiding the judge's decisions in the trial thus far.
     
  11. NCEast

    NCEast New Member

    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We were all pretty much expecting the defense to pluck another expert in computer forensics so I'm sure it didn't come as a surprise to the prosecution. Don't know about the legal wranglings though since he was added at such a late hour. Waiting on the judge to preview the report........
     
  12. GhostCrab

    GhostCrab New Member

    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just the application of the case law is interesting and what the judge decides to do with it.

    And to look to the future, the state wants to add experts so the defense could just turn some of this case law around and drop it on the them when that comes up.
     
  13. SleuthinNC

    SleuthinNC New Member

    Messages:
    1,338
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Additional 600 something files with invalid stamps during the week of July 16th? Again I thought the laptop was powered off until it was given to the FBI.
     
  14. cassius

    cassius New Member

    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    apparently the fbi has only 2 agents that can help BOZ read a report.
     
  15. KellyCrash

    KellyCrash New Member

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Web Sleuths being introduced into evidence
     
  16. snowshuze

    snowshuze Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    <waving to the camera> HEH.
     
  17. GhostCrab

    GhostCrab New Member

    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. NCEast

    NCEast New Member

    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I heard Kurtz mention the new state witnesses. He was rather gracious for a change instead of whining about it. I guess it's 'turn about, fair play'.
     
  19. DogWood

    DogWood New Member

    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Mr. Ward's post at WS now in court.
     
  20. jrb0124

    jrb0124 New Member

    Messages:
    1,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    4,700+ invalid timestamps?


    Websleuth posting by JW now being discussed...
     
  21. snowshuze

    snowshuze Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Dear Mr Ward....we told you about this....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice