State v Bradley Cooper 4-25-11

[jrb0124]

Kurtz: WS posting not an authenticated document.
BZ: if court requires we can go find JW and bring him in...

 

[SleuthinNC]

OK if the judge disallows this new witness based upon websleuths he should be recused immediately.

 

[fran]

OK, was the recent exchange about Kurtz didn't know where the pros got the info, on the internet or something........................

Was that about Websleuths?

fran

 

[LAWsy_ME]

Prosecution says they can find Mr. Ward to testify regarding the state's exhibit (which appears to be the long posting by JW on W/S) Defense objects that the state's exhibit is not verified.

Defense argues it appears to be something found on the internet or emailed to the Prosecution

 

[gritguy]

Haha! Kurtz just said pros not ready to cross because they have not had the chance to see Mr. M's facebook page. LOL

Man, if he said that, that is a major b-slap!!

 

[less0305]

OK, was the recent exchange about Kurtz didn't know where the pros got the info, on the internet or something........................

Was that about Websleuths?

fran

Yes, the posting I think has been presented to the judge.

 

[jrb0124]

Kurtz: (paraphrasing) this is the only piece of significant evidence the pros has presented, we need to be able to tell our side.

 

[SleuthinNC]

Boz is clearly willing to defend his flimsy case by any means necessary. If there is nothing to hide in the analysis of the FBI report, let the jury weigh the testimony and hear the evidence.

 

[DogWood]

OK, was the recent exchange about Kurtz didn't know where the pros got the info, on the internet or something........................

Was that about Websleuths?

fran

Yes.

They are talking about JW's post here.

 

[LaLaw2000]

Yes, the posting I think has been presented to the judge.

Thank you! I just got here and did not know what was going on!

 

[less0305]

Thank you! I just got here and did not know what was going on!

I knew JW shudda never done that.

 

[less0305]

I knew JW shudda never done that.

Of course, it may amount to nothing.

 

[jrb0124]

waiting for judge to rule on witness...

 

[bloghooligan]

I'm getting the impression there was something found -- from a computer forensic perspective -- that the state is afraid of.

And Kurtz believes that Mr. M can put some doubt into the evidence of the google search at Fielding Dr. Which, imo, is the only solid evidence at this point.

 

[unc70]

OK, was the recent exchange about Kurtz didn't know where the pros got the info, on the internet or something........................

Was that about Websleuths?

fran

The posting by Jay123 late Wednesday night thread.

 

[DogWood]

15A - grants states motion to supress.

 

[GhostCrab]

Unreal. JMO

 

[bloghooligan]

Judge grants state's request! oh my goodness.

 

[less0305]

Ha, your little trick, Kurtz, did no workee.

 

[CrimeAddict]

Man, if he said that, that is a major b-slap!!

witness supressed due to Pros not being ready and needing time to research and adequately prepare for cross and FBI computer witnesses unavailable to help pros.