I think I remember it being close to that, sometime around the 3rd week of July. And I hate to say this (I truly mean no disrespect) but I think the child does look very much like JP.
Sadly, I also agree about the second daughter...but it's very much my hope that she is BC's daughter.
Some of my personal thoughts throughout this case:
1) I thought BDI when I learned about the necklace..felt it was the strongest piece of CE. I have pieces I wear for certain streches of time, and I also have many female friends who wear a certain earring, bracelet, ring, etc all the time. I used to be a runner, so wearing a necklace running did strike me as odd, but not implausible. And all her friends insisted NC never removed it.
Therefore, today's video and evidence completely crushed that piece of evidence. And that leads to the credibilty of many of the State's first witnesses. Which in turn, makes you have to question all of them. And this right after we hear about the ducks which those same early witnesses insisted had disappeared....even when they were shown a picture of one of the ducks clearly on the fridge in the police photos they were shown.
2) NC's blackberry. My take, until last week, was "that was a dumb move, show's the CPD is inept". But intenionally destroying or tampering with evidence? I absolutely did not believe they were diabolical like that.
Then last week we got new evidence in the blackberry wipe. And it tells me there was no accident, and it was intentional. So that means only LE had access to do this intentional act.
3) The google search, which I thought was a clear smoking gun. It's been called into question, then the defense was not allowed to have their expert testify to it. As of this afternoon we know we now have an accomplished expert in Computer Forensics stating it was compromised...and that witness will also not be allowed to testify.
Given the bb situation, I have to admit, I think this Thinkpad was very likely tampered with by LE. Evidence tampering in this case is no longer a longshot imo.
4) Lots of discussion about bringing up affairs and paternity. I don't think JP or JA were involved in NC's death. I think NC was most likely killed by a stranger. But the reason these things are brought up is NOT to trash the victim. It's to show to the jury that there were other people who had the motive, mean, and opportunity. And CPD never investigated them as suspects...or even persons of interest.
So what does the State have left now? The phone call BC allegedly faked? Yet all of their investigations show it was a real phone call. Nothing to show it was faked in any way.
This pretty well lines up my time on this board; going from a "most likely BDI" to "the state hasnt' proven guilt" to "I think this guy is innocent".