There is no question in my mind that Steven is guilty. The evidence against Steven is overwhelming and frankly all allegations of him being framed are not only supported by zero evidence but are so illogical it boggles the mind how anyone can be so far down the rabbit hole. Let's just look at the illogic at work. 1) Steven Avery would not want to rape her and kill her but family members who either never met her or barely interacted with her would decide to follow her to rape and kill her. 2) Since Steven Avery would not do it his family must have done it and he must have been framed thus: A) they must have burned her elsewhere and took the time to transport dozens of buckets of ash containing fragments of her bones and teeth and were so careful and laborious at the excavating they even got tiny rivets from her jean in the ash and also brought back the burned remnants of her electronics to plant and for some irrational reason have planted some remains in Janda barrel 2 as well. B) Must have taken the Rav from a safe location elsewhere to Avery Salvage C) Must have planted his blood and DNA in the vehicle and on her key and then have planted the key D) Must have somehow planted her DNA on a bullet fired by his gun It would take a great deal of evidence to establish something so wild occurring and is totally illogical to prefer to believe something so wacky and wild before believing Avery is guilty. I have argued against Avery supporters for many years and not one was able to come up with a rational response to my challenge to them to come up with a logical reason why someone would undertake the unprecedented action of planting remains and vehicle on someone's property when such is not necessary to escape criminal liability. I posted the same challenge on this site now: Why would an Avery family member bring evidence back to Avery property? I really don't see any way that Avery can be innocent and don't understand how anyone else who is informed of the facts can think he is innocent.