I don't need to read this statement back to myself.
no proof he didn't sexually assault her.
that is a fact.
no proof he did.
that is a fact also.
maybe you need to read it back again to yourself.
So the notion of innocent until proven guilty is lost on you then. This is the problem with the people involved in this case. He’s guilty and until we are convinced otherwise he can rot in jail. Not he’s presumed innocent (which by law is what we are all instructed to do) and then let scientific facts prove he did it.