SuperDave arrested?

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Tricia, Dec 19, 2018.

  1. Niner

    Niner Long time Websleuther

    Messages:
    42,743
    Likes Received:
    107,272
    Trophy Points:
    113
    @SeesSeas - any updates for next "deadline" or a court hearing since the 9/25 deadline?

    TIA! :)
     


  2. SeesSeas

    SeesSeas FLORIDIAN

    Messages:
    6,318
    Likes Received:
    13,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CM/ECF - U.S. District Court - Vermont (LIVE)-login
    U.S. District Court
    District of Vermont (Rutland)
    CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:19-cr-00001-gwc All Defendants

    Case title: USA v. Hughes
    Magistrate judge case number: 2:18-mj-00171-jmc

    Date Filed # Docket Text
    08/28/201933 ORDER granting 32 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions as to David Hughes (1). Pretrial motions are due by 9/24/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 8/28/2019. (esb) (Entered: 08/28/2019)

    09/24/201934 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements by David Hughes. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, Barclay) (Entered: 09/24/2019)

    10/03/201935 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements by USA as to David Hughes. (Gilman, Andrew) Event/Text clarified on 10/3/2019 (jlh) (Entered: 10/03/2019)
     
  3. Linda7NJ

    Linda7NJ Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    31,600
    Likes Received:
    5,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok....I am going to need some time to digest this news. I’ve been away from Websleuths but had previously interacted with SuperDave - a lot.

    I found him to be very knowledgeable and had a good grasp of the subject matter & the PSYCHOLOGY of the subject. Little did any of us know ...he had first hand experience. How often do we get to pick the brains of those WE SEEK in hopes of solving crimes?

    My thoughts & prayers go out to his victims and the families FIRST and foremost.
    I hope they will all get JUSTICE .....

    Back to SuperDave ...the need for me to understand how & why child predator’s think the way they do, will send me back to read every single post he made and to re-read his book. Yes, I bought it, he even autographed it for me. Gag.

    This reminds me of Silence of the Lambs ...and we are all Clairese.

    STUNNED I TELL YA, STUNNED.... but oddly ...not surprised.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2019
    Jackson Flash, tezi, neesaki and 13 others like this.
  4. Linda7NJ

    Linda7NJ Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    31,600
    Likes Received:
    5,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right???
     
    tezi, margarita25, LaborDayRN and 2 others like this.
  5. Linda7NJ

    Linda7NJ Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    31,600
    Likes Received:
    5,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’ve been OBSESSED with this case from the day it was first reported. I can’t let it go.
     
    tezi, gramcracker, GoBuckeyes and 7 others like this.
  6. SeesSeas

    SeesSeas FLORIDIAN

    Messages:
    6,318
    Likes Received:
    13,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CM/ECF - U.S. District Court - Vermont (LIVE)-login
    U.S. District Court
    District of Vermont (Rutland)
    CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:19-cr-00001-gwc All Defendants
    Case title: USA v. Hughes
    Magistrate judge case number: 2:18-mj-00171-jmc

    Date Filed # Docket Text
    10/09/2019 36 ORDER granting 35 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements as to David Hughes. Time extended to October 22, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 10/9/2019. (This is a text-only Order.) (jal) (Entered: 10/09/2019)
    10/22/2019 37 RESPONSE in Opposition to 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements by USA as to David Hughes. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Gilman, Andrew) (Entered: 10/22/2019)
    10/31/2019 38 RESPONSE in Opposition to Request for Hearing by USA as to David Hughes re 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements.(Gilman, Andrew) Text clarified on 10/31/2019 (jlh). (Entered: 10/31/2019)
    11/05/2019 39 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements by David Hughes. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Quinn, Elizabeth) (Entered: 11/05/2019)
    11/05/2019 40 ORDER granting 39 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to David Hughes (1). Reply due 11/12/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 11/5/2019. (esb) (Entered: 11/05/2019)
    11/12/2019 41 REPLY to Response to 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements and in support of request for a Franks hearing by David Hughes. (Johnson, Barclay) (Entered: 11/12/2019)

    PACER Service Center
    Transaction Receipt 11/14/2019 10:22:48
    Description: Docket Report
    Search Criteria: 5:19-cr-00001-gwc
    Billable Pages: 4
    Cost: 0.40
     
  7. Hoosgirl

    Hoosgirl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didn't know what a Frank's hearing was so looked it up ... interesting.

    Franks Hearing Law and Legal Definition
    Franks Hearing is a hearing to determine whether a police officer's affidavit used to obtain a search warrant that yields incriminating evidence was based on false statements by the police officer.

    <snip>

    At this hearing, the defendant has the burden of proving the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. If an affiant's material perjury or recklessness is established by a preponderance of the evidence, the warrant must be voided and evidence or testimony gathered pursuant to it must be excluded.

    Franks Hearing Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
     
  8. BoldBear

    BoldBear Active Member

    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    28
    This is something that enters my head from time to time so I come here. I only know Dave as a JB expert here (especially the politics behind the investigation.) I view this with a sense of horror. He was always the one who said it doesn't matter if someone looks innocent. People you don't suspect are capable of incredibly horrible things. If he doesn't get convicted, I'll always hold suspicion. If he does, then I think I'll have a sense of closure.

    I really don't understand why I feel betrayed. Dave's a stranger. I know nothing about him. He could have been a murder in prison for all I knew, but I never imagined him that way.
     
  9. Tadpole12

    Tadpole12 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,076
    Likes Received:
    9,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BB

    It's been a year since JH's arrest.


    I now feel that SD is little more than just a compilation of words on a page;

    fictitious.

    A pedophile, before and since his inception over at WbbS decades ago.

    ( self edit)

    A con.

    A duper.

    A man with a Cinderella complex wrt JonBenet.

    A fantasist.

    A soul sucking vampire.

    A real peace of ****.




    As a human being he betrayed humanity,

    a family and three children.




    It's okay and understandable if you feel betrayed.


    Take care BB.
     
  10. Tadpole12

    Tadpole12 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,076
    Likes Received:
    9,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    SS, thank you so much for your continual updates on the case.
     
  11. Niner

    Niner Long time Websleuther

    Messages:
    42,743
    Likes Received:
    107,272
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anything new on the court site @SeesSeas - last I have was 10/22. About a request for a Frank hearing. TIA! [​IMG]
     
  12. SeesSeas

    SeesSeas FLORIDIAN

    Messages:
    6,318
    Likes Received:
    13,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    10/22 ?
    My last post was 11/14 which reflected a docket entry dated 11/12 about the Franks hearing request.
    Too soon to check Pacer.gov so that I don't get a large bill from the feds. Perhaps mid-DEC. ;)

    11/12/2019 41 REPLY to Response to 34 MOTION to Suppress Evidence and Statements and in support of request for a Franks hearing by David Hughes. (Johnson, Barclay) (Entered: 11/12/2019)

     
  13. Niner

    Niner Long time Websleuther

    Messages:
    42,743
    Likes Received:
    107,272
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oops - sorry - I must have missed that.... :rolleyes: I shall update my notes! ;)
     
  14. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    6,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone have an update on this case? Thank you.
     
    Tadpole12 and margarita25 like this.
  15. Niner

    Niner Long time Websleuther

    Messages:
    42,743
    Likes Received:
    107,272
    Trophy Points:
    113
    for the latest see SeesSeas's post #786....
     
    Tadpole12 and GoBuckeyes like this.
  16. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    6,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That poor mother. I'm sure that she would agree that protecting her children is her first responsibility, and I'm almost certain that at the time, she felt she was. There are several activities that span across age groups that can legitimately bring together a 10/11 year old and an adult. Video games and sports are two that come to mind for me right away. When I was around that age, I used to shoot hoops with a neighbor. He was in his early to mid 20s. He was nothing but a very kind neighbor who encouraged me and gave me basketball tips.
     
    Lavender Moon, Tadpole12, byo and 3 others like this.
  17. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    6,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Am I correct when I take this to mean, LE can lie to a suspect, but they can't lie to a judge in an affidavit to secure a search warrant?
     
    Tadpole12 and BadRx like this.
  18. Kiranerys

    Kiranerys #LiveLikeLizzy

    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    8,166
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Eeeeww:(
     
  19. Sophie

    Sophie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    63
    PS. Another thing I've been thinking about in terms of Dave slipping under the radar is many of us have had spells where we spent more time on here than is strictly healthy, these episodes have been relatively short and we've returned to much more moderate patterns. I recall suffering appalling insomnia when I was pregnant with my last child and being on here at all hours. Dave, however, was always "on." If other posters had been as prolific as him over such a lengthy period of time, they might have noticed something seriously amiss. As it is, I don't think anyone quite saw the extent of his obsession.
     
  20. Sophie

    Sophie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    63

    That's an excellent point. There are so many innocent reasons for adults spending time with kids and stories like David's add another layer to the suspicion parents feel about anyone taking an interest in their offspring.
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice