The Anthonys, I am guessing, would fill out their taxes like all of us do. So in 2007, and again in 2008, who put Caylee down as a dependent on their tax returns ? Was it KC ? ( what tax returns , right ?) or grandma and grandpa ? If it was grandma and grandpa, they were saying, on those documents, that they were providing most of the money to support Caylee. I don't doubt for a minute that they DID provide 100% of the money to support Caylee. But..... If my child were a single mom, without a great paying job, I'd probably tell her to go ahead and claim the baby on HER taxes. It isn't much, but it probably helps her more than it helps the grandparents, maybe in a refund or something. G & C probably get to claim interest on the mortgage, any charities they contributed to, etc. So why the heck not tell KC to go ahead and get a little money back, or at least have less to pay in taxes. by claiming financial responsibility for her own baby. Or...did they also claim KC as a dependent ? I don't know if you can do that with an adult child, but if they could,would they ? AND... If they went ahead and put Caylee down as a dependent, does it mean they believed whatever cockamainy story KC dreamed up as to why she wasn't filing her taxes. Or, did they KNOW KC had no job. No job= no need for a nanny . They cannot have it both ways. Either she had a job, paid taxes, paid a nanny, or she didn't.