I know there are facts some of us are not privy to...but others out there in the World Wide Web are.
It is reasonable to think that the Cummings and Sheffields monitor the sites.
I suspect there are lots of facts in this case that we, online, are not privy to.
Not all of the parties in this case (attorneys, parents, grandparents, etc) are posting online, IMO.
JMO I pray she doesnt surf and read any of the stuff either with all the lies and hurtful things said about her family.
100% agreement on your first point. If this case goes to trial, we'll learn a lot, but we'll still never know all the facts, imo.
As to your second point, my opinion is that we don't know who is or isn't posting (including TN) and we will never will.
Bolded by me
I'm doing my best to be agreeable and diplomatic on here, but I have to disagree with the last part of your post Shaymus.
Presuming there is an arrest [and my heart will not allow me to believe otherwise] we will be privy to the internet usage of all sides of Haleigh's family - whether presented by the defense or the prosecution. [Just look at Jesse Grund info available now. Note that he was a gov't employee, too, so all of his work records are public record.]