Threads on websleuths come up on internet searches, so it makes no difference if it is on page one or nine.
the affidivit mentions that the previous court order had told him to remove all comments he had made on the internet or do his best to. I am sure i read it on his own website too.
I seem to remember in the aisenberg case that the wire taps proved to be very controversial, because the transcripts were very damning and had them more or less admitting it, but when the judge ordered for the actual tapes to be played they were impossible to hear or make out and the judge said the transcript did not represent what was actually said. i cannot remember where I saw this though, so I could be thinking of another case.
I remember the mccanns along with the dowlers wrote to the PM to as them not to stop no win no fee legal fee arrangements, so I was not sure if carter ruck operated like this for them.
