Really? Interesting to hear your point of view. I think the prosecution, in particular the last couple of days have been gold. I think they have let GBC basically tie himself up, contradict himself, show himself for who he is very well AND he himself has in doing so, countered some of his earlier claims. Now I know that doesn't exactly 'prove' GBC murdered his wife. But a picture is being painted- of lies and deceit..over many years. A pattern of behaviour- coupled with the experts tesimony regarding the Autopsy, Allisons emotional health at the time, the scratches on GBC's face, the leaves in her hair. It is all circumstantial.. but put all together circumstancial evidence can become very compelling evidence. Many cases do in fact rely on circumstancial evidence- this is certainly not the first. Many have also been convicted on it also. I have yet to see a plausable explanation from the defence as to what may have happened to Allison otherwise. In regards to the no sex with Allison claim, I believe the fact they had 2 kids in that time does kind of counter the claim. The pill doesn't really offer proof either- as it can be taken for things other than contraception.