Aug is Utah Cold Case month and the Utah Cold Case Coalition is featuring Rosie Tapia's case
Click on Rosie Tapia's Thread and help Websleuths find Rosie's killer

The Discovery Process

Discussion in 'Heather Elvis' started by 2Hope4, Aug 16, 2014.

  1. 2Hope4

    2Hope4 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,228
    Likes Received:
    3,479
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Well then...as I heard mentioned in another case, "Your Honor, he wants us to do his work for him, and that's not our job!" *perhaps not exact wording*

    Also sounds like he wonders if SM has turned state's witness. Otherwise why would it ask what deals if any have been made for state's witness?? He's even asking for any other suspects they may have had, and why they aren't now. I realize there's discovery, and it will be turned over to the defense, but I don't know that I've ever read a motion for discovery like that one. Maybe Baez would know.

    BTW, any more word on the pregnancy??
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Salem

    Salem Former Member

    Messages:
    29,160
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Defense is moving for discovery docs and info.

    Salem
     
  4. Salem

    Salem Former Member

    Messages:
    29,160
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So did SM's lawyer not do the same thing? Or we just haven't seen it yet?
     
  5. Dr. Know?

    Dr. Know? Former Member

    Messages:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. Motherof5

    Motherof5 New Member

    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've seen nothing....makes you wonder.
     
  7. Dr. Know?

    Dr. Know? Former Member

    Messages:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I honestly don't know how far a gag order can go. The court docket site is public records, FOIA, I thought? But, if an ongoing investigation is going on, I guess they could gag it? Where's the lawyers?
     
  8. Motherof5

    Motherof5 New Member

    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not sure either.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  9. EmmaRose

    EmmaRose Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't know much about court system etc., but would SM's lawyer not be filing papers for him because he knows that SM turned state witness?? I can't think of another reason why nothing is being done for Sidney. Can anyone tell me if he were to be a witness against Tammy, what would happen to his charges? Odd there is no movement in his behalf.

    Another question. Are TM and SM being tried together or will they have separate trials?
     
  10. Makaroni

    Makaroni Member

    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
  11. Surfside

    Surfside Active Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What am I doing wrong? When I click on your link, I get the public search index. After entering SM's name, the list isn't populating anything more recent than 02/27/2014 for him. :doh:
     
  12. Dr. Know?

    Dr. Know? Former Member

    Messages:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Surfside, do it again and click on the top pending case (kidnapping) and under the header with info there are tabs that say charges, sentencing, actions, associated cases & bond. Click on actions and it should bring it up. I copied it anywho. hth


    The State of South Carolina VS Sidney Stclair Moorer

    Case Number: 2014A2610200462 Court Agency: General Sessions Filed Date: 02/27/2014
    Case Type: Criminal-Clerk Case Sub Type:
    Status: Pending Assigned Judge: Clerk Of Court C P, G S, And Family Court Disposition Judge:
    Disposition:
    Disposition Date: Date Received: 02/27/2014 Arrest Date: 02/23/2014
    Law Enf. Case: 13117285 True Bill Date: 03/20/2014 No Bill Date:
    Prosecutor Case: Indictment Number: 2014GS2601125 Waiver Date:
    Probation Case:

    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Motion to compel Motion 09/02/2014-14:13
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Order/Order Order 04/03/2014-09:06
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Order/Order Order 03/21/2014-14:28
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair True Bill Indictment Filing 03/20/2014-09:18
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Other Filing 03/17/2014-16:29
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Notice of Motion Action 03/05/2014-13:52
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Certificate of Representation Action 02/28/2014-13:36
    Moorer, Sidney Stclair Imaging of Warrant Filing 02/27/2014-11:03
    http://publicindex.sccourts.org/Horry/PublicIndex/PISearch.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
     
  13. Surfside

    Surfside Active Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Thanks buddy.
     
  14. JerseyGirl

    JerseyGirl Moderator Staff Member Forum Coordinators

    Messages:
    24,238
    Likes Received:
    4,258
    Trophy Points:
    113
  15. seattlechiquita

    seattlechiquita Active Member

    Messages:
    5,771
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I found this interesting:

    What kind of exculpatory evidence could they have on SM's favor? Me thinks they are delusional.
     
  16. Motherof5

    Motherof5 New Member

    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Have they "discovered" TM's fake pregnancy during this process?

    :liar:
     
  17. brandalous

    brandalous Member

    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I noticed that the photo on one of the articles about the request for a speedy trial has a caption that says it was taken Monday. She does NOT look like a woman that would be ~7 months pregnant, to me!

    http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/crime/article_bed8590c-425d-11e4-9bdf-001a4bcf6878.html

    EDIT - I also noticed the article says something about being updated today, and then in the body says something will happen March 17, so it could be an old picture in a poorly- re-tooled article. :facepalm:
     
  18. Surfside

    Surfside Active Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It looks like an oversight to me. I think they used an old photo and failed to remove the original caption. That bond hearing already took place on Monday, March 17, 2014.
     
  19. lonetraveler

    lonetraveler Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,201
    Likes Received:
    2,716
    Trophy Points:
    113
  20. razzledazzle

    razzledazzle Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Likes Received:
    598
    Trophy Points:
    113
  21. OkieGranny

    OkieGranny New Member Staff Member Forum Coordinators

    Messages:
    21,517
    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.thestate.com/2014/10/28/3774178_second-motion-to-compel-evidence.html?sp=/99/132/&rh=1

     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice