Again, something we've discussed before but this is an interesting interview with Henry Lee: http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0311/03/lkl.00.html KURTIS: Dr. Lee, didn't you take a look at some tape in the JonBenet Ramsey case, reexamine it? LEE: Yes. Yes, I did. Yes. KURTIS: And there was nothing became of that. LEE: Well, that's a two-inch tape and it's been used. It's not like the Laci Peterson case, which, as I say, I cannot comment too much on that. Used. So why do IDI get away with using the missing roll of duct tape as evidence of an intruder?