If his good side was the authentic one he would have admitted himself to a psychiatric hospital when he first started having these tendencies. Alternatively he could have turned himself into police when the abused his first victim. He is a sociopath with no feelings towards anyone bar himself. Fellow humans, especially children, are all puppets for his amusement. Sociopaths see themselves as the only 'real' people and the rest of us could not possibly be thinking, emotional beings like they are so our needs do not count. We all read his indifference to the little Cambodian girl's fear and pain. That's why I think any good he has done is for his own purposes - for public admiration and to conceal his true nature. Sociopaths certainly feel no need to help anyone out a sense of compassion or moral conviction. They are incapable of those feelings.
The average human does have their good and bad sides. The difference is that non-sociopaths do have a moral sense of right and wrong. Though we don't always do the right thing we have a sense of guilt when he hurt others. Regular people can balance the needs of others against their own and can empathise with another's pain. Even a non-sociopathic murderer can have a good side. They may be loving sons/daughters or parents or kind to animals. They chose to kill out of greed, jealousy, anger but can love and empathise nonetheless. A sociopath like Took cannot. That is why none of his 'good' can be genuine.
Well said Kiki!:clap::clap:
I didn't get past the first page of the article - too heartwrenching for me.
Salem