Discussion in 'Darlie Routier' started by JenniferTx, Apr 18, 2019.
Those fibers from screen came from knife and I think it was cut by the killer but not darlie.
Darin doesn't have 2 brain cells to rub together. No way is he "manipulating" experienced detectives. So everyone was involved in conspiring to send a dumb housewife to death, huh? For your own sake you need to read the trial transcripts in their entirety. Including the appeals.
I don't believe The Innocence Project took Darlie's case.
If they did then they're doing an amazing job of keeping it hidden from the public!
Seriously though, IMO a couple people associated with the IP volunteered to consult and advise Darlie's legal team and nothing more, unless some new DNA result pops up that could exonerate her. And IMO that's not going to happen. MOO.
Agreed. I just wish they could find proof about Darrin. imo
Proof about Darrin for what?
When the police arrived the crime was so recent that one of the boys was still trying to breathe. Darli was covered in blood and her footprints were everywhere. Where is the evidence that Darrin did it? Or did he manipulate the physical evidence as well as every single person involved in the investigation and trial?
She doesn't meet the criteria for the IP to take her case. Nor is she listed on their website as one of their cases. One of their lawyers did consult on the bloody partial print. Preparing the print to run it through AFIS
Darin was not involved in the murders of his sons. He was fully investigated and cleared. If someone has some physical evidence he did, they can still charge him They can't charge him on lies, rumour and speculation.
Have the I.P taken her case on or not? That is the crucial question. MOO
The IP persee has not taken Darlie's case because she does not fit their criteria. However, two attorneys from the IP, Vanessa Podkin and a Jane Putcher have applied to the court to be added as consulting attorneys with Stephen J. Cooper.
That tells me Darlie must be getting closer to a death date since this motion was just filed with the court last week.
The IP has confirmed they took her case. They’ll either find something or they won’t. Whether you agree or not, I’m thankful there’s people who look these cases over. We do have people tried and convicted that aren’t guilty.
I just checked the Innocent Projects website and I don't see Darlie Routier listed as one of their cases.
All Cases - Innocence Project
She isn't listed on the IP website but I've found a couple of articles in the past week that state a couple of lawyers from the Innocence Project are getting a look at the case. Easy enough to Google - that's how I found them.
I have no problem with anyone going over the evidence, It proved she was guilty before and it will again. Why? Because she is. My opinion and the opinion of her jury too.
Why isn't she listed on their website then?
Yes the motions are quite easy to find. The court has approved two lawyers, working independently of the IP, Potkin and Pucher, to join the appelate team. The IP has Not accepted her case.
Me neither. The evidence is stronger now than it was at trial due to the 2015 Y=STR DNA tests. No unknown male DNA was found on the evidence tested which includes the bloody print 85J, the black ball cap, the murder weapon and Darlie's nightshirt.
Also the bloody sock found outside, no unknown male DNA found on it.