A few thoughts, If we believe there was an intruder, if they were there to burglarize the place then upon seeing there were people home, most perps would flee the scene. If the intruder was there to rape DR, then in my opinion they would secure DR first so she could not move or make a sound, then quickly do the same to the kids before going back to spend time raping DR. If the intruder was after the kids (for sexual purposes), then upon finding DR was present killing or securing her would be the absolute first thing to be done, before taking time with the kids. The order in which things happened just does not support an intruder in my opinion, for whatever reason they were there. Even if an intruder was purely on a killing spree, it still makes sense to kill DR first. If DR supporters are so confident in her innocence then why don't they enlist the US number 1 wrongful conviction lawyer, Kathleen Zellner. Her team will review a case for $3000, but if she finds anything pointing to guilt she won't take the case. Would DR take a brain fingerprinting test to establish her innocence or guilt? My guess is no way she would.