TOTAL SPECULATION.... Regardless of who planned, directed, or ultimately gained from the crime; the sheriff clearly believed that the ninth member was supposed to disable the video surveillance system. You might expect this person to have the following attributes: * Trust of BB and MB * Access to grounds and house -all parts. * Intimate with security setup and location/operation of controls * Someone whose presence is so expected, it is almost not even noted * Therefore a person who meets all the above requirements and also is willing to be associated with a violent crime, might fit the following profile: * Long local criminal history, including violent acts, drugs, lying, battery, resist arrest and assault on police w/viol, financial judgments, foreclosures, court directed drug rehab, suspended prison sentences, violation of probation, use of crack cocaine, poss cocaine and paraphernalia... record extending back into juvenile * Very well known to the family, and in a position of physical and emotional closeness. * Might only be willing to operate on the assurance the children would not be harmed * Tell the media they have no idea why someone would do this, or who could have * Based on history of how similar crimes often unfold, person might even have been the first contact for LE. * Have the middle initial "M."