The Presence of the Ransom Note

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Ottavi, Nov 18, 2010.

  1. Ottavi

    Ottavi New Member

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hi everyone, I have only just joined but have been reading for a few weeks.

    I hope this is not too repetitive a post. Please if it is, let me know or delete it.

    I'm really hung up on the presence of the ransom note. I have been trying to understand what purpose it served, in relation to the murderer. These are the options as far as I can think:

    1. Intruder - the ransom note is legitimate. Killing JB in the house was not part of the plan, but it happened. Problem - Why did they not take JB's body with them & still collect on the ransom. Why leave behind physical evidence in the form of the ransom note. Once JB was dead, the RN served no purpose other than to potentially incriminate the true murderer.

    2. Intruder - the ransom note was a ruse to divert suspicion to another fictituous intruder. Problem: Why leave a ransom note pointing to an intruder, when you are one. You are placing yourself (as an outsider) into the pool of possible suspects. Why not allow LE to focus almost solely on the Ramsey's, as is highly likely if no ransom note had been left. Again, why leave behind physical evidence, when there is nothing to be gained from it.

    3. Insider - the ransom note was a ruse to divert suspicion to an intruder & remove suspicion from the real murderer. Problem - Leaving of physical evidence. However did this outweigh the fact that without a RN suspicion would be immediately on members of the household.

    I'm interested in anyone else's view as to the purpose of the ransom note. Particularly if anybody has any ideas on how it could benefit an intruder.
     
  2. Loading...


  3. MurriFlower

    MurriFlower Inactive

    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can I add another?

    4. Intruder - the RN was designed to divert the attention of the Rs so their daughter was left unprotected while they believed JR's older daughter (in Atlanta?) to be the kidnappers target.
     
  4. Plenum7

    Plenum7 New Member

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    While I'm happy to consider all sorts of possibilities Ottavi I think the best explanation for why there is a ransom note at all is that it was designed to implicate the housekeeper (and her circle). It is not so much what is in the note that indicates this, but where we are told it was found. The housekeeper LHP often left notes at the bottom of the spiral stairs. Patsy said that at first she thought the r.n. was another note from LHP. THAT, for me, is the important clue here. The (unexpected) r.n. stands in for another (expected) note. So the note is part of an attempt to implicate LHP.

    This fits with the placement of the body. When asked who last went into the wine cellar the answer was LHP's husband. And it fits with the placement of Burke's knife near the body. And it fits with the ransom amount - the housekleeper could know about JR's bonus. So JR says "It must have been an insider." The first thing the Ramsey's did was point at the housekeeper. But when that story didn't stick their story changed.

    Why is there a note at all? Because it was designed to point to LHP.

    There are many objections to this scenario though, especially in the content of the note.
     
  5. wonderllama

    wonderllama Registered Snoozer

    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I don't think I understand what you mean.
    (Directed at Murri)
     
  6. MurriFlower

    MurriFlower Inactive

    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The RN addresses Mr Ramsey (John) and refers to 'your daughter' (unnamed). If they had been told this soon after putting JBR to bed (presumably safe in her own home), they might have formed the conclusion that it referred to MR having been kidnapped (in Atlanta).
     
  7. claudicici

    claudicici Active Member

    Messages:
    2,921
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    My opinion is different....
    I believe whether IDI or RDI the ransom note was part of the game,of the twisted fantasy.
    If IDI I don't think it was written because JB was actually about to get kidnapped.
    If RDI I don't believe the note was written after JB's death.I don't believe in the staging.
    I believe it all started with the note either way.IMO the note reveals a state of mind and the writer was trying to deal with issues within his/her mind.I think the writers mind was clouded ,angry and desperate.
     
  8. Tadpole12

    Tadpole12 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Hiya claudicici.

    Hmmm. So RDI wise you can entertain the possibility of premeditation, that the note could have prepared with JBR's demise as the final outcome?
     
  9. claudicici

    claudicici Active Member

    Messages:
    2,921
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    yes,I believe if RDI it was pre meditation.I believe if PR she felt like something she "had" to do,something about her religious thoughts all twisted up and something about abuse.
    JB had to die to be saved.
    If BR it was part of a sick game that got out of hand and may have involved others?
    Jmo...
     
  10. SunnieRN

    SunnieRN Active Member

    Messages:
    3,577
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I believe the note was pure and simple CYA. I don't believe this was perpetrated by a SFF, as they would never admit to the fact they were a small group and I believe that the writer lived in the Ramsey home.
     
  11. OpenMind4U

    OpenMind4U New Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Purpose of RN? The only one: 'was a ruse to divert' from the real motive of JBR murder.
     
  12. madeleine

    madeleine New Member

    Messages:
    4,970
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't believe in a staging so much either,it's way too sick,the garotte gives me the creeps,it's the piece that screams sick puppy to me.
    My problem is,why would a sane parent cover for the sick one?
    Makes me believe they were both in it,religion maybe?JB being safe now,what argument is that?
     
  13. joeskidbeck

    joeskidbeck Rest in Peace

    Messages:
    1,897
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey Madeleine! Good to see you. The sane/sick parent is a good question, but I'm wondering if both of them had their own kind of "sickness", so utimately, they had to cover for each other. I think it boils down to this: no matter how it happened, they would have both had too much explaining to do for it to look innocent. They had to make it look like someone else came in the house that night.
    You know, others have said it (mostly in regards to the rn) but I believe there are lots of parallels to the Zahra Baker case here. Starting with parents that each had their own brand of "sickness".

    ETA: I know the garrote is very sick and twisted (no pun intended), but try to think of other alternatives. They had to have an "obvious" cause of death. Something that when LE looked at her body, the knew immediately what killed her (or thought they did, anyway). That leaves us with some tough questions. Do you think they could have stabbed her repeatedly? This one only leads to another question. Were they smart enough or thinking clearly enough to know that if they stabbed her repeatedly there would not be enough blood to account for it? LE would have known at first glance that this did not kill her. What are some other methods of death that would have been obvious at first glance? I can't think of any more that LE would have seen immediately and that would have meant the killer didn't have to actually "touch" her body to do. Can you think of anything that would have solved the problem at hand?
     
  14. madeleine

    madeleine New Member

    Messages:
    4,970
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Didn't follow this case,will have to look it up.
     
  15. madeleine

    madeleine New Member

    Messages:
    4,970
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Re this scenario
    The head bash would have been enough.IMO
    No need to stage something else.The bad kidnappers hit her head,end of story,kidnapping gone wrong.

    and I still don't think the strangulation was just staging.she was alive when strangled (with what exaclty I have no idea!maybe the cord,maybe something else).i'd rather believe in the overkill scenario,which kinda points more to BR?
    ahhhh,dunno!
     
  16. claudicici

    claudicici Active Member

    Messages:
    2,921
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    reading those old "brother moon" posts I am now almost convinced PR did this and a lot of it has symbolic meaning.It made sense to her.She was God and JB was the sacrificial lamb and at the same time they were still one and will be so for eternity.
    The "sane" one (JR) had to cover for her because he was the abuser.
    JMO JMO JMO but this makes perfect sense to me at the moment.
    I always felt more like BR myself because it seems almost like a horrible,insanely twisted game but reading all of PR's statements again I realize how child like she really was at times.Everything was over the top,over dramatic but at the same time immature...
     
  17. joeskidbeck

    joeskidbeck Rest in Peace

    Messages:
    1,897
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0

    BBM

    This is one of the reasons that I cannot get Patsy out of the role of stager. It is so over the top and dramatic that it has her name written all over it. I can't seem to settle on one opinion of who did what or who covered for who, but Patsy writing the note is one absolute for me. I don't think JR even had any input into the contents. Honestly I dont think he even read it till right before the 911 call. I bet he almost lost it when he realized just how bad Patsy hated him right then. Because she no doubt hated him with a passion! That's one of the things pretty obvious in the note. Sorry, but the part about "respecting John" is pure BS. Just one more way she wanted this note to point straight to John Ramsey.
    I would love to see the ID Discovery network do an episode of "Fatal Attraction" on these two. If you've ever seen this show, you know that most of the time, in these couples, one of them by themselves would be pretty harmless, but when these people team up, havoc ensues. I believe this is what happened with John and Patsy Ramsey. Of course, I know they could never do the show unless one of them were convicted of the crime, but I can hope, can't I?
     
  18. joeskidbeck

    joeskidbeck Rest in Peace

    Messages:
    1,897
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BBM

    You are right in that the head bash would have been enough if it weren't for a couple of other things. Number one is the prior abuse. If you believe prior abuse, you then know why they went "over the top" with the staging. How many IDIs do you know that believe the way they do because they cannot wrap their heads around any parent doing these things to their child's body? If they were honest, it would be most of them. That's why there had to be so much staging. It had to look to LE and the whole world that there is no way these parents could have done this. I believed that way at one time (I think you did too, right?). But now we have another case where the parents actually dismembered their child's body (Zahra Baker). To me, this even trumps what the Ramseys did to JB. My mind won't even process this. But I tell you one thing, people will not come to the Baker's defense and here is why. They have no money, no social standing, no political affiliations, and more importantly, they don't deserve it. The Ramseys didn't deserve it either, but let's face it, they were a "good family" with money and clout and it does not happen in families like their's (not if the "powers that be" can help it, that is).
     
  19. SuperDave

    SuperDave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,263
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Beck, you deserve an ovation.
     
  20. SunnieRN

    SunnieRN Active Member

    Messages:
    3,577
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What if they were not covering for each other, but for their other child? Would that make it more palatable? It did for me, in the fact that it was something I could understand. That along with other clues has convinced me that Burke and not his parents is somehow responsible.
     
  21. madeleine

    madeleine New Member

    Messages:
    4,970
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe ......a bit,still I find it a very bizarre choice.(garrote)
    BUT BDI would explain their behaviour.Perfectly.It's the only thing that explains their behaviour&actions actually.IMO
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice