Just for background - PR Interview June 23 1998
20 TOM HANEY: If there was something in it it
21 would belong to John Andrew then?
22 PATSY RAMSEY: Yeah.
23 TOM HANEY: Did John Andrew have a Dr. Seuss
25 PATSY RAMSEY: Did John Andrew have a Dr.
1 Seuss book? (Inaudible).
2 TOM HANEY: Or when he was older, like now?
3 PATSY RAMSEY: I hope not. He is supposed to
4 have college books, not Dr. Seuss books.
5 Why would you ask such a question?
6 TOM HANEY: Well, that is because in that
7 suitcase was a Dr. Seuss book.
8 PATSY RAMSEY: What book was it? Did it have
9 any kid's name in it?
10 TRIP DEMUTH: That I don't know. I think it
11 had John Andrews' name in it.
What is curious about this line of questioning is that it is put at all! Interviewers know the case belongs to JAR, that the book belongs to JAR, more so if its the Adult book.
Yet they ask and PR knows what to ask immediately: Did it have any kid's name in it?
Trip Demuth has a I think answer for a reply, neither side wish to give much away here.
If the Dr. Seuss book is the Adult one then I reckon the suitcase and those photographs could belong to JAR given the anecdotal evidence regarding an obsession with JonBenet?
If its not the adult one then its prior use can be questioned, particularly in relation to JonBenet.