trial day 43: the defense continues its case in chief #130

Discussion in 'Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias' started by nursebeeme, Jan 9, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. outofstatelawyer

    outofstatelawyer New Member

    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anyone find it odd that the DT hasn't put either parent of JA on the stand? Her mom could have said she was wrong for using a wooden spoon, she's become more educated on discipline, etc.
     


  2. BeachGirlFromPA

    BeachGirlFromPA Always digging a little deeper....

    Messages:
    1,400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    JM said " 14 onward..." YES.
     
  3. verbonica

    verbonica Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, she tried perhaps to say that... if Dr. D. wouldn't have kept interrupting and talking over her!
     
  4. miss plum

    miss plum New Member

    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yay Judge, yay JM, STFU JW.
     
  5. BetteDavisEyes

    BetteDavisEyes Fasten your seatbelts...

    Messages:
    31,195
    Likes Received:
    50,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just a guess, but perhaps she just saw the interview with her father and Det. Flores for the first time.
     
  6. :floorlaugh:Oh that was so worth starting late - SHODDY WORK!
     
  7. JusticeJunkie

    JusticeJunkie New Member

    Messages:
    5,107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I should have trusted. Juan said 14 and ONWARD!! yeah!!
     
  8. Timber

    Timber New Member

    Messages:
    373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    JA looks pizzed off.
    Willmott too.

    Sorry defense team, your witness opened the door to this testimony being allowed in.
    ALV is the one who claimed JA was never deceitful before the murder.
     
  9. Weebles

    Weebles New Member

    Messages:
    1,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  10. JRS_JD2L

    JRS_JD2L New Member

    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly...but did you hear Juan got that in:

    "And with respect to that statement, it was regarding the defendant at the age of 14--and onward, right?"

    JW didn't catch it.
     
  11. Donnareit

    Donnareit Verified Victim's Advocate

    Messages:
    1,049
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Deja vu.
     
  12. Mrs G Norris

    Mrs G Norris Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    14,003
    Likes Received:
    5,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Play the victim, did I hear Juan correctly HA!
     
  13. corundogs

    corundogs Active Member

    Messages:
    3,394
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    THANK YOU!!

    JW stood up there and said it as known fact in the court room.

    I don't believe that is the case.

    I have often seen people say (not just this case, in general) "get them on the stand under oath".

    What makes people think just because someone is under oath they are telling the truth?????
     
  14. Novice Seeker

    Novice Seeker My thoughts are all mine

    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What's the point, seriously, JW is still going to object, stomp her foot, argue with the judge, make the judge instruct JM on how to do his job:furious::furious::furious::furious:
     
  15. scmom

    scmom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,602
    Likes Received:
    2,991
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some, are we to understand she was a liar before she was 14?
     
  16. Mrs G Norris

    Mrs G Norris Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    14,003
    Likes Received:
    5,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oooh ... she is so angry and wrong today!
     
  17. ILikeToBendPages

    ILikeToBendPages Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,024
    Likes Received:
    29,987
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I thought she was agreeing with JW that it would be prejudiced against Jodi.
     
  18. KBisMe

    KBisMe New Member

    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ALV is looking pretty beaten down!!
     
  19. rose222

    rose222 Active Member

    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I understand that, thank you! LOL
     
  20. AZlawyer

    AZlawyer Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    7,883
    Likes Received:
    2,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If her parents were on the stand answering the questions, it would not be hearsay. On tape, it is hearsay.

    If they get on the stand and say something different, the tape could then be played to impeach them. Still hearsay, but an exception would apply. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice