TX TX - D’Lanny Reinelle Chairez, 20, (found/arrested) & James, 18 months, San Antonio, 22 Feb 2021

Discussion in 'Missing Persons Discussion' started by PommyMommy, Mar 8, 2021.

  1. MsMarple

    MsMarple Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,392
    Likes Received:
    38,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All JMOO... I don't doubt that children are sold or illegally adopted out, rehomed, etc. but in the cases here that I've followed over the years that hasn't happened.

    So while anything is possible it will take a lot of evidence for me to believe a parent who has stated that they can't take care of their kid actually gave the child to someone. Parents also tell tales of the child "disappearing" from playgrounds or parks where the child is eventually found deceased and the parents are charged with murder.

    Erica Parsons was not given to a fictitious "Nan," Chance Walsh wasn't given to relatives in South Carolina, Caylee wasn't taken by "Zanny," Evelyn Boswell wasn't taken by her grandmother. So why would I now believe James is being cared for by someone?

    As sad as it is IMO James is no longer living and this is another case of a mother who chose to harm her child. MOO.
     


  2. WillowBee

    WillowBee Active Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    28
    <modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

    They havent had any searches since shes been arrested.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 19, 2021
  3. WillowBee

    WillowBee Active Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    28
    I don't feel like that is the case here. I do believe he is with the couple that DC told her Aunt about. DC isnt going to tell her family who they are because she stated that she didnt want James growing up like she did and having to explain who his father and grandmother are.
     
  4. Dre

    Dre Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,894
    Likes Received:
    28,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You think she would go to prison before letting police know who he’s with?
    It also does not sit well with me that all his toys and items were strewn about with a blankie that had blood on it.
    Me thinks there’s one reason that she left his items behind never to return to that home.
    Moo
     
  5. WillowBee

    WillowBee Active Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    28
    It was a sheet with some old blood on it. If it was his blood the courts would not even consider reducing her bail or giving her house arrest.
    The sheet was found by her family first in a room that she used for storage.
    It has not been verified it was a crib sheet. People assumed it was because a crib was in the storage room .
    It was later stated by family that she and James slept in the room.
     
  6. nannymo

    nannymo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am sorry...If that baby was with a couple who was caring for him, she could confide in the police and have everything sealed in court where the family cannot locate him. I wish so much that is the case, but unfortunately I have been on these threads too long and I no longer believe everything parents say. Such a sad situation. This baby and so many others deserve better.
     
  7. Jo in Calif

    Jo in Calif Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,547
    Likes Received:
    13,605
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. MimosaMornings

    MimosaMornings Well- Known Member

    Messages:
    5,831
    Likes Received:
    44,289
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That room that looked waist high in debris? That’s where they slept? Yikes
     
  9. PommyMommy

    PommyMommy #ShinelikeShanann

    Messages:
    33,535
    Likes Received:
    322,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    APR 20, 2021
    'James is not with us anymore..' Family still begging for answers to missing toddler | KABB (foxsanantonio.com)

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    [...]

    Baby James Chairez's family is pushing for answers after a grand jury indicted his mother on a charge of tampering with evidence.

    As the days go by without any sign of the one-year-old -- the family is losing hope of finding him alive.

    "James is not with us anymore,” MG, his great-aunt said. “I don't feel like James is with us anymore."

    [...]

    "Why did she decide to run from February 22/23 all the way to March 16?" Gomez asked. "That's a lot of time away. If you're not guilty of something then, why are you hiding?"

    [...]

    "It just makes me sick to my stomach, what did she give them to be able to have this new charge,” Gomez asked.

    [...]

    Chairez's child abandonment charge is still pending. She was supposed to visit with family Tuesday but cancelled

    [...]
     
  10. PommyMommy

    PommyMommy #ShinelikeShanann

    Messages:
    33,535
    Likes Received:
    322,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    APR 20, 2021
    Closing arguments end in Sutherland Springs trial, as plaintiffs blame Air Force, U.S. government | kens5.com
    [...]

    The mother of a missing toddler already facing charges in his disappearance has been indicted by a Bexar County Grand Jury on a charge of tampering with evidence.

    "The charge reflects that on March 15, 2021, D’Lanny Reaneille Chairez, knowing that an investigation was in progress did intentionally and knowingly conceal a child (James Chairez)," a release from the Bexar County District Attorney said. "Tampering with evidence is a third degree felony punishable by 2 to 10 years in prison and a possible fine of up to $10,000."

    [...]
     
  11. imstilla.grandma

    imstilla.grandma Believer of Miracles

    Messages:
    13,407
    Likes Received:
    100,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
  12. Dre

    Dre Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,894
    Likes Received:
    28,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm finding it really hard to believe that there's already a trial date... aren't they somewhat just beginning their investigation? I feel like there must be so much more to do ?!
    Like find baby James...
    moo
     
  13. PommyMommy

    PommyMommy #ShinelikeShanann

    Messages:
    33,535
    Likes Received:
    322,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Noting:
    • Dlanny's trial is scheduled for June 16 in the 144th District Court.
    • She was initially charged with abandoning or endangering a child but the DA’s Office replaced that charge Tuesday with two counts of tampering with evidence.
    • Court documents state she “intentionally and knowingly” concealed James from two investigations — one with the SAPD and the other involving CPS.
     
  14. PNW

    PNW Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    299
    Trophy Points:
    53
    A lot of courts are now setting trial dates at arraignments. Then they have case setting hearings that push the trial date out. So the trial date almost always changes.
     
  15. PommyMommy

    PommyMommy #ShinelikeShanann

    Messages:
    33,535
    Likes Received:
    322,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If it was a murder case, I'd agree with you. But, I don't think the tampering charges are going to be all that complicated. MOO
     
  16. WillowBee

    WillowBee Active Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    28
    No. It was a room she used for storage.
     
  17. WillowBee

    WillowBee Active Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    28
    She no longer has the Child abandonment charges.
    It's a F3 Tampering with evidence.
    Most likely documents
     
  18. WillowBee

    WillowBee Active Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Her case is sealed. The next hearing is in family court.
     
  19. katydid23

    katydid23 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57,562
    Likes Received:
    118,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
  20. Lusitana

    Lusitana Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    20,720
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It seems like they have reason to believe the baby was not harmed.
     
    Marg from Oz, Bethan, Flicka1 and 3 others like this.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice