- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 13,534
- Reaction score
- 89,188
Ugh, the defense lawyers may have the law on their side. I'm not a lawyer but my research reveals that when a foreign national is arrested and his/her country of origin is not on the list of mandatory notification to the consulate then the interrogating officers must notify the person, whether legal or illegal, that they have the right to consult with their country's consulate. The person can then accept or decline to consult. Nothing I've read says the foreign consulate has rights to contact the illegal immigrant however.Article today posted about the case. Not only are they trying to get a change of venue, they are also trying to suppress his statements and claiming he wasn't advised of his rights. Also, they are saying they would not allow him to meet with the consult from Mexico.
Zavala-Garcia attorneys seek change of venue, suppression of statements
The responsibility lies upon the LE officers who actually make the arrest. The same applies to FBI or U.S. Marshall officials. As far as I can see, preventing the Mexican Consulate Representative from speaking with Zavala-Garcia may be a moot point; the crux of the matter seems to lie in two areas; whether he was informed of his Miranda rights and whether he was informed of his right to contact with a Mexican consulate rep.
Unfortunately, this motion may hold because Zavala-Garcia was originally detained on a federal immigration detainer. If no one advised him then or later when he was charged with murder there could be a problem. Sadly, if he wasn't advised originally then it would have been okay if he was advised when he was charged with murder. If he wasn't then it's a problem.
However, as long as he was read his Miranda rights then the point of contention is about his right to a Mexican consulate rep. According to the article it appears the defense lawyers are seeking a hearing whereby a jury would determine if there was a breach. That tells me there may be legal precedents where statements have not been thrown out. IOW, if it was hard and fast then all the lawyers have to do is cite the law.
The good news is there is a mountain of evidence against Zavala-Garcia so I don't think this issue will make or break the case. And once the DNA results are in I believe his goose is cooked. MOO.
Sorry for the long post.
Zavala-Garcia attorneys seek change of venue, suppression of statements
https://travel.state.gov/content/da...ces/CNA Manual 5th Edition_September 2018.pdf