I am using a 1987 phone book. I googled visage photo agency and there is an article about its founder. It never mentions that. https://books.google.com/books?id=N...NzAF#v=onepage&q=visages photo agency&f=false
Yeah I agree. She seems to not be connected to anyone. If she had gone to an American public school, you think someone would have called by now. We know the signatures on the Idaho ID and DL's must be her's and they are all fairly simple. I wonder if she had left that life behind, why she kept that box of Kryptonite? If I were her husband, any box I was told not to look in, well it would be the first thing I would look in. That explanation is very odd to me. I find his entire lack of curiosity a bit perplexing. Do you think if a major network did a 48 hrs or Dateline this would be solved that night? Seems so strange that nobody has seen this story that knows her.
I decided to take a closer look at the handwriting of the scribble page and the only other handwriting sample we have of FLEK's--the handwriting on her passport application.
First, compare the two words Dallas: The D's are different and though both samples use capital A's in the middle of words, the capital A's are different as well. One is more rounded at the top and one more pointed.
Second, compare capital M's--very different. One has rounded peaks like a lower case M and center line of the m reaches the bottom of the letter. The note writer's M's are pointy at the peaks with high center swoop line.
third, compare B's. There is only one B on the application but it appears to be written like a 3 with a line in front of it--two sections disconected. The B's on the note page are written more in one fluid motion and all connected.
Fourth, compare lower case y's. On the application the y's have a rounded hook. On the note they are angular.
Finally, compare the "These Eyes" to everything else. I flipped it 90 degrees to make it easier to compare. It has been noted before in these threads that the "These Eyes" has those curly capital E's in the middle of the word and FLEK used those capital E's in her writing. The rest of the note does not have those capital E's. The y in "These Eyes" is also a hook style like used in the application, not like the rest of the note.
The main thing these writings have in common, IMO, is using a mixture of capital and lower case letters for the middle of the words.
After this analysis, I'm prepared to theorize that the majority of this note was NOT written by FLEK--it may have been written by someone close to her (parent, sibling, etc.), however, who had a similar style of mixing capital and lower case letters.
I also compared FLEK's signatures. There is a slight variation in how she makes her L's and K's but that could be attributed to her getting comfortable signing her fake name rather than printing it--She would not need to sign it very often unless she had a checking account and wrote checks. I have been thinking her real name could have been Lori (or some variation like Laurie) but this apparent progression in how she made capital L's would argue against that theory. It seems to me she became more comfortable writing Lori by the time she was married. All MOO.
Here they are side-by-side. Now that I look at them next to each other, and taking into account the neighbor's reference to her being the smallest he had seen her, I feel like this could have been maybe six months after the birth of her child. Her daughter was born in 2008 (I believe, off the top of my head). So, perhaps this was in late 2008/early 2009. Quick and dirty math...she would have been claiming to be 39, but was probably more around her early to mid-thirties.
http://old.seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021243552_janedoexml.html - Reference to neighbor.
Of course, MOO...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
