Discussion in '1970's Missing' started by Sailor Haumea, Dec 14, 2017.
I NEED to learn to read!
This is an exciting update, for sure!
Exclusive: N.C. Man Waits for DNA Results Putting Him in Wake of Death Row Killer
This is very exciting , and I'm guessing this is why the sister commented on Matt's blog to me that she didn't understand , she probably never knew of him . so very sad.
I need to get Finding Sharon now that it's out.
I haven't really followed things since it was determined the brother wasn't missing. But now he was in fact missing. But it's still maybe missing?
It would be cool if someone familiar with genealogy websites were to create a family tree for Sharon and all her kin.
its GOOD BOOK and our speculation appears to be correct about the "family Dynamics" there's one of Suzanne's sisters on FB that CLEARLY is pissed about their upbringing and lies that were told .
wow, this is so interesting but confusing
if the 'adoption' was legal, then why couldn't whoever was looking for him (who was looking for him? who put the entry in Namus?) find him, esp. since he had the same first and middle names and same birthdate?
What search terms should I be using on FB to find this sister and her comments? Is there a specific group or am I looking for the sister herself?
look at "A Beautiful Child FB and its easy to follow the trail of family the sisters that are on there are Friends with the other sister that is very vocal about mom and shes at the opposite end of the country too, West coast
Did they ever say what the DNA results were?
Yes he was a match but I cant find the article , Ill keep looking
I first read about this case a few years ago, and followed up today... so I'm only now learning that Sharon Marshall was finally identified as Suzanne Sevakis, and all the rest of the now available information. I've not read Matt's books, but I have read his website and a few others I've found out there. I was sad to learn that Suzanne's mother never found her daughter (or her son for that matter). I wondered what steps she took to look for them besides contacting police? I found myself wondering today why she wasn't screaming from the rooftops once her daughter's true identity was revealed, along with how FDF "raised" (kept her captive) all those years? I'd be screaming blue murder, and looking for some way to sue to police who had not so much as filed a missing person's report for my children!! I'd go so far as to see FDF in prison (who's to say she has or hasn't?) and be hounding that fool or manipulating him to try to get some answers at least as to where Phillip ended up, and where Michael ended up!!
So I'm still trying to determine if the DNA matched to the man who was adopted who shared the same name as Suzanne's brother: Phillip Stephen....? Any results?
Also... I read the obit for Suzanne's mother's most recent husband... I found it curious that her husband had a son listed with the same surname as her son Phillip... things that make ya go hrm...
Read the 2nd book , you wont feel sorry for her mother AT ALL!
I just ordered it. From what I read though, it appears that mom decided to place Phillip for adoption BECAUSE she had FDF the new man in her life under some assumed name and she quite literally appears to have chosen that man over her son, so she placed the child for adoption and somehow failed to mention that to police!! I find it hard to believe that the man who's DNA was being tested as recently as late April 2019 wouldn't be the Phillip that she gave up for adoption given that his adoptive mother knew Sandi and had worked with her for a time before becoming the child's adoptive mother.
I'm ordering the second book probably this week but by all accounts it seems mom really didn't seem to give one iota that her daughter was missing. So I wonder... did she SELL her daughter to the man she married? Also, if she REALLY gave a damn for that child, or her other children, wouldn't she be screaming about the injustice of the police having done nothing to help her find them all these years??? I mean some sort of law suit or damages or something???? Argh.