<modsnip - quoted post was removed>
Yes, a number of what appear to be questionable actions and/or unanswered questions. I get it. But there are many, many other questions and/or actions that never seem to be addressed by the "family conspiracists". Anybody can arrive at a desired “conclusion” if they selectively choose only information that fits the narrative that they wish to express. It is done all the time in fields such as advertising and government.
I do not know what happened to Tom. Hopefully, some day the truth will be known. But, in order to arrive at the full truth, one must be willing to consider ALL evidence and circumstances ….. or at least a true investigative effort to find answers.
The OAG informational packet contained a lot of information but it did not disclose much new information. They listed a significant number of activities/efforts on behalf of the investigation BUT they disclosed very little information regarding the RESULTS of those efforts. The total intent of the information release was simply to preempt Klein. Nothing more.
Regarding the OAG information, we know who submitted to 4 of the 9 polygraph exams but we don’t actually fully know the results; just bits and pieces. Also, we don’t know who submitted to the other 5 exams. We don’t know where the 9 formal searches were conducted or what, if any, evidence was found. We do not know the results of the 99 interviews/contacts. And, there was very little information disclosed regarding the 150 search warrants and subpoenas. We know that OAG did a cell “tower dump” but we don’t know anything they may or may not have learned.
Just IMO, I am impressed by the amount of effort that OAG has put forth on the case. But there are MANY other questions that remain unanswered at this point. Some are:
The friend of TuB (TR) would be a direct witness but there is no public information (that I am aware of) regarding his statements or interviews; you can bet your life that he definitely was questioned.
Why did early investigators neglect to conduct a thorough investigation into all possibilities as related to the evidence that was clearly available at the time? (LE involved at the time were actually very experienced and not inexperienced as some have suggested.)
Why were searchers turned back from the gate at Lake Marvin Road?
Regarding the deputy who found the remains: why was he looking for deer antler sheds at a time 2+ months earlier that when deer normally shed antlers?
Why did OAG initially choose to not disclose the skull fracture information? Just curious.
What was the cause of the facial injuries? Assault? Very important question.
What is the significance of the 25 caliber casing inside the vehicle and the small pistol case found close to other discarded items along Lake Marvin Road? Murder? Was a firearm utilized in a suicide then another person disposed of the firearm?
Once again, if suicide is suggested …. then what was the cause for the facial fractures? Important question.
Why did the CCTV footage from the two most important locations disappear?
Why did the Fronk Tech make a very detailed statement to OAG, then during subsequent questioning become extremely nervous only to have a sudden total lapse of memory and recant his original statement? Very odd to say the least. OAG though this memory lapse was so strange that they issued a warrant to view his phone records.
As noted before, IMO there are simply too many questions remaining to arrive at any valid conclusion.