Again, and given that there is no legal requirement to include or specify a location in a charge, the very nature of the charge itself makes the reference to "at Machynlleth" nonsensical unless LE have some very specific evidence linking the offence to Machynlleth.
That said, I've just come across this on the Fountain of Knowledge that is Wikipedia:
"Many criminals dispose of bodies in a river, hoping that the body is carried away. However, this method will most likely lead to a quick detection of the body, because the body gets entangled at the side of the river, or stopped at a dam, or is simply seen floating by others.
Just posted a question on a legal forum re: the above, will provide feedback as soon as I have it.
Mods - are there any specific issues involved with quoting info on another forum or does this only apply to social media such as FB?
Just posted a question on a legal forum re: the above, will provide feedback as soon as I have it.
Mods - are there any specific issues involved with quoting info on another forum or does this only apply to social media such as FB?
If LE have such specific evidence that the crime was committed in Mach, why would they continue to search a much wider area
If LE have such specific evidence that the crime was committed in Mach, why would they continue to search a much wider area
Or does the concealment occur as soon as the child enters the van?
I imagine because, wherever a crime is committed, it is possible to dispose of the evidence elsewhere given sufficient time.
Good find!
Is Machynlleth in Council Powys and Ceinws in Council Gwynned?
Yes, and this thread has turned to what we all think is the inevitable. However, I don't think her body is in the river as a 'body' if at all.
Enough said, I hope and really pray my instincts are wrong.
JMO
What is it that you think has happened?
It still remains a fact that there is not one single piece of evidence or fact in the public domain to point in any solid way to MB as having abducted april jones
IMO
So true. But as discussed there appears to be a lot the public are not privy too, presumably from legal reasons. I imagine though, that the police do have some solid evidence that at this moment in time, is not being released to the public.
Think we will have to wait for the trial, as said before.
What does this tell us?
http://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/i/27529/
'a sufficient number of uncertainties' (per Justice Griffith-Williams)...
...versus
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-19853582
'sufficient evidence to charge' (per CPS Iwan jenkins)
Case, or no case?
LegallyBrunette said:Is Aberystwyth the closest major centre to Mach? For example, if you needed to go to a govt dept, major bank, something like that, is that where you'd go?
Edit: reading about it now.
Also, how far from Aber to Holyhead?
I know what you mean but Machynlleth is a town not an area, region or county. The very nature of the charge suggests otherwise.
"That between September 30, 2012 and October 3, 2012 at Machynlleth, with intent to pervert the course of justice, did an act, namely the unlawful disposal and concealment of the body of April Sue-Lyn Jones, which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice contrary to common law. "
I think this is pointing to disposal (full or in part - I'd rather not say any more than this) in the river.
Lots of photos on story link as well.
The search area - the size of a tennis court - leads down to the river where the man carrying the black bag was seen by two witnesses at 1pm on Tuesday
Two women witnesses told police they spotted a man carrying a black bag down to the river below the hillside.
Carwen Sheen, 36, was chatting to a friend on the opposite river bank when they saw the figure scrambling down a gulley leading to the water's edge.
She confirmed she has given information to police about what she saw and a description of the man she saw at 1pm.
The women reported what they had seen near the village of Ceinws - about five miles away from April's home in Machynlleth - to detectives looking for April.
BBM
Ok, I 'm confused on this and may need some local help on this....
My understanding of this was that the women saw him coming down a bank nearer to the Dyfi Bridge than Ceinws. ?
From what i saw on the news reports the bank down to the river behind MB's garden wasn't as overlooked as much and more private.
But if it was nearer to Ceinws are we to believe that these two women were 'there' just chatting on the riverbank?
My point...I don't understand why they would have been in Ceinws, they are from Mach and it sounded like they were just having a casual stroll and chat more than doing any kind of search.
Can anyone shed any light on this please?
Ah thanks, yes it is the Dulas behind MB's house. The report says 5miles from Mach, the Dyfi Bridge is virtually on the edge of town.
Ceinsw hardly seems the type of place to me that these local ladies would go for a stroll too??
IIRC Ceinsw was not part of the search area on Tuesday afternoon, but I could be wrong. i too thought what they were doing there, its like five miles away. And coincidentally spotted the suspicious looking man.
The other thing is if it was MB they saw at 1pm how did he get to Machynlleth river bank by 1.45 to be caught on camera? By channel 4.
Thats if that was him as well or at all in the two sightings.
Yep, could well be. Just find it odd after looking at MB's house and surrounding area on Google that it's not an easy place for two ladies to access without going on what looks like private property.
I had thought it meant further along from the Dyfi bridge where the man was also filmed by channel 4.
:what:
I think veggie or jigzy posted a photo a while back of a shale bank and said it was very likely the one police were searching. Photo was before they started searching. And if I got this right, it's the Dulas? -before it joins the Dyfi.
http://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/i/27529/Defence counsel, John Hedgecoe, said : "We anticipate there is going to be an enormous amount of material in this case. We will require some time to absorb that material and for solicitors and leading counsel to see Mr Bridger in conference."
BBMWhat does this tell us?
http://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/i/27529/
'a sufficient number of uncertainties' (per Justice Griffith-Williams)...
...versus
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-19853582
'sufficient evidence to charge' (per CPS Iwan jenkins)
Case, or no case?
"There are a sufficient number of uncertainties to make it impossible for me to form a view as to when this case can be tried. But it should be understood it will be tried on the earliest possible date in the new year."