UK - Judge allows teacher to carry on teaching despite 3500 images of child porn

Discussion in 'Crimes-Spotlight on Children' started by gregjrichards, Jun 19, 2016.

  1. gregjrichards

    gregjrichards Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    "A judge has allowed a music teacher to continue working with youngsters despite him being caught with 3,500 images and videos of child and bestiality pornography.

    Neil Deller, 42, had a daily 'fixation' with watching sex assaults on girls as young as three and graphic content found on his computer also involved dogs and horses.

    But he was spared jail after 12 parents of children he has continued to teach since his arrest two years ago wrote positive references to Chelmsford Crown Court on his behalf.

    Continued

    Instead, Judge Ball QC imposed a community order on Deller, who has taught privately and in state schools across Essex and Hertfordshire.

    He ordered that Deller, from Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, must attend an internet sex offender treatment programme.

    The judge argued that there was compelling evidence that he did not pose a significant risk of sexually abusing young people.

    He said the treatment programme was an alternative to prison when there was 'a very real prospect of rehabilitation' and he considered that to be the case with Deller.

    But Judge Ball refused a request to ban Deller from teaching under 18s, after prosecutor Daniel Taylor argued: 'He comes into contact with children on a regular basis so it is proportionate in order to protect those individuals.'

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ages-videos-child-bestiality-pornography.html
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Itsmevkb

    Itsmevkb New Member

    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is amazing. To me, it has zero to do with whether or not he will end up sexually abusing anyone and everything to do with the fact that him viewing child pornography contributes to the market for it. I can't believe there are parents out there who would support him. They should begin to imagine that it is their children in the pictures and movies he is viewing.
     
  4. x_files

    x_files Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,573
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    parents support him? wow...beyond disturbing.
     
  5. Renee110

    Renee110 New Member

    Messages:
    1,488
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I give up. Why bother caring or feeling anything? I doesn't matter in the end.
     
  6. squish

    squish New Member

    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Many perverts have enchanting personalities, which is how they manage to simultaneously get their victims (in this case the victims are those he viewed in child porn) while having everyone thinking that they are a wonderful person who could never do such a thing.

    I can only hope that this is one of those such cases - that the parents don't believe he's actually guilty.

    I can think of some horrible worst case scenarios of why the parents might be supporting him but I don't know if I should mention them here.

    It is absurd that the judge thinks that there is "compelling evidence" that he wouldn't abuse children. He enjoys child porn, and like many paedophiles has sought a career that involves working with children. That is by far enough for him to be considered a serious risk to children.

    These people cannot be rehabilitated. I think this pervert must have friends in high places for him to be able to get away with this.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice