GUILTY UK - Libby Squire, 21, last seen outside Welly club, found deceased, Hull, 31 Jan 2019 #25

Discussion in 'Recently Sentenced and Beyond' started by cybervampira, Feb 2, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Alyce

    Alyce Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    34,413
    Trophy Points:
    113


  2. jamjim

    jamjim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kasmeer, RosalindaA, Sally4x and 19 others like this.
  3. Edinlass

    Edinlass On Time Out

    Messages:
    2,106
    Likes Received:
    10,511
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Looks like the jury haven’t got a majority vote as yet. What a shame on Libby’s family.
     
  4. Steve2021

    Steve2021 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I was going to say as much as i loathe PR I wouldn't want him found guilty for something he's not done. But then I thought may be I would or at any rate wouldn't have a problem if he was, because a. the only way he's likely to get a sentence that we the public of the UK feel is appropriate for rape is if he is found guilty of murder, and b. it may bring Libby's parents a bit more comfort. So using a utilitarian stance perhaps it's better for everyone (save PR) that he is convicted even if innocent.
     
  5. bos

    bos Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    2,633
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Lethal hypothermia – a sometimes elusive diagnosis

    So it seems as though a common way of ascertaining whether death has occurred due to hypothermia is the presence of particular markings on the stomach lining due to the micro circulation failing. These “spots” aren’t always present & whether they’d survive after weeks in the water is unclear.

    It seems conceivable to me that Libby’s heart & breathing could have slowed so much/stopped with the exertions of attempting to fight PR off/being manhandled/rape that he assumed she was dead.

    The defence wouldn’t ask about that likelihood as it would imply resistance rather than consent.

    I wonder if the prosecution questioning established the possibility of this?
     
  6. ChiCubs2016

    ChiCubs2016 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    11,359
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I actually prefer the jury take their time and deliberate. They have mounds of evidence to sort through. This is a complicated case IMO. If they came back right away I might wonder if they just wanted to get it over with. It is a duty of all jurors to make sure they ponder their verdict intelligently and properly, again IMO. Here in the states if you get put on jury, a lot of people would say “where you too dumb to get out of it?” It really boggles my mind that people think this way.
     
  7. Jenesaisquoi

    Jenesaisquoi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    4,392
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Out of interest, is there even the remotest possibility that this jury at this stage could find him not guilty of rape? And then not guilty of her death?
     
    Marg from Oz, Edinlass and JosieJo like this.
  8. Cherwell

    Cherwell Ice Cream

    Messages:
    5,835
    Likes Received:
    12,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    <modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

    Yes, I agree with you.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 8, 2021
  9. PitchforkRed

    PitchforkRed Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    53
    100%. The whole point of the jury is to weigh up evidence and question what has been said on either side. The last thing you want is for them to go into that room, say 'yeah whatever' and deliver a verdict 10 minutes later. They've given the last 4 weeks of their life to this, I am glad that they are giving the evidence the consideration it deserves. If I am ever on a jury I would want to make damn sure I am making the right decision; that means listening to the arguments of others and hopefully, eventually, coming to a consensus.
     
  10. bos

    bos Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    2,633
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Agreed. The time taken to appoint a foreman of the jury and maybe taking a vote on each of the charges before they start examining them in detail probably accounted for Thurs pm alone
     
  11. Lyall0814

    Lyall0814 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    686
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I still think it won't take long after they've been told majority verdicts are allowed.
     
    Marg from Oz and Legally Bland like this.
  12. CoverMeCagney

    CoverMeCagney Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    12,518
    Likes Received:
    54,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I really hope you’re right but I am concerned about the weather for tomorrow. If @Joolz1975 can give us a 6am snow report that’d be great!
     
  13. Lyall0814

    Lyall0814 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    686
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Looks certain to be a lot of it this evening and overnight o_O
     
    Marg from Oz, C.greek, jamjim and 6 others like this.
  14. Miss_French

    Miss_French Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    966
    Likes Received:
    2,013
    Trophy Points:
    93
    'End' is an old term for field; World's End is just a name for a remote piece of land.
     
  15. Lyall0814

    Lyall0814 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    686
    Trophy Points:
    93
    And it doesn't take much snow in the UK for chaos to ensue :D
     
  16. PitchforkRed

    PitchforkRed Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    53
    It's not that bad in Sheffield at the moment but it is snowing right now and forecast snow showers to continue for the next few hours and tomorrow morning. Police have issued a 'no journey is worth the risk' appeal, so it's in the balance.
     
  17. Newthoughts

    Newthoughts Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    14,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're not the only one confused

    I don't think you have to plan to kill for it to be murder tho. As far as I can understand If you intend to cause serious bodily harm it counts.

    You can't use, as an excuse, behaviour by the victim or use inherent weakness as an excuse.

    This is my understanding - but I'm not a legal person so I'm probably way, way out.

    So as I would interpret it as trying to silence someone during a rape is causing serious bodily harm that could lead to death. Or any violence during the rape that could lead to death. It's reasonable to assume that.

    If Libby hadn't been vulnerable it might not have done - tho I think that's debatable.

    But you cannot use as an excuse something like you only planned to rape and shut them up but they died because they were vulnerable because of their state. It seems to be your responsibility to accept the victim as they are "under the egg shell skull"

    So any underlying dispositions and vulnerabilities are irrelevant as I read it.

    So he couldn't use as an excuse, Libby's vulnerability. He couldn't assume that a non drunk, non hypothermic person might have survived his attempts to rape and silence her cos the onus, quite rightly, is on the killer not the victim. He didn't chose a sober victim.

    Otherwise, I guess, you could quite legally attack vulnerable children or people with heart conditions or people who are vulnerable like Libby and say it's only because they're vulnerable.

    That is how I'm understanding it but I'd welcome input from a qualified person.

    The other thing it says is you cannot use the behaviour of a victim as an excuse. So as I understand that you can't say - I only planned to rape someone but they fought back or wouldn't shut up. The onus remains with the rapist not to kill them or it's murder.

    That seems to apply to escape as well as far as I can see. If your victim dies as a result of escaping - the onus seems to remain with the killer.

    As I'm reading it, as a rapist he should done a full health and safety check to avoid murder.

    But as I say that's how I'm understanding it. A legal person needs to explain it

    Homicide: Murder and Manslaughter | The Crown Prosecution Service
     
  18. JosieJo

    JosieJo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    9,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At least the jury are taking it seriously..there was always a danger here that emotion alongside his past convictions would lead to a knee jerk quick verdict
    Looking at our poll ... even based on the small amount we have heard its quite split
    The length of time it took to charge him also has a bearing on the difficulties and challenges of the evidence
     
  19. TheCasual

    TheCasual Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    1,414
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I just don't see enough evidence to convict him for murder.

    The big problem for me is the timings.
     
  20. Tortoise

    Tortoise Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    82,173
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Silencing Libby is not an indisputable fact of the case. Screams are very much a part of the evidence, as are timings.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice