Sweeper2000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2022
- Messages
- 2,336
- Reaction score
- 6,599
Yeh the private eye have opened up a article about this just reading it. Same thing for pages now, they don't mention any of the other incriminating evidence we heard just go on about the med details and again sff the "on duty chart". I have yet to see anything that has enough weight to challenge the convictions. they only go on about potential "hospital failings" which I think have to be discounted as the coch had the highest level of reviews and at this point multiple levels of it and nothing was found. Yep short staffed but these and the other babies didn't apparently suffer for it did they? Not a single thing to say any baby suffered due to short staffing. Potential other medical problems may have happened as well but nothing to say what? In fact when asked what else could it be not one doctor and many have presumably tried has been able to provide a viable alternative from a medical angle to the prosecutions and then you pile on the evidence we did hear that wasn't to do with other staff or the hospital and you 100% get the same result. It's a sound result and popping in for tea and biscuits with a baby murderer is not going to help anyone but the person who "did this".
Special Report: The Lessons of the Lucy Letby Case
After Lucy Letby was convicted in August 2023 of murdering seven babies, a number of experts contacted Eye columnist MD because they
www.private-eye.co.uk