How solid is this close relationship, where did you hear it?Just as a further twist to this, I've been told that JR was close to COLIN IRELAND. I'm not suggesting he was involved but it's a bizarre link
How solid is this close relationship, where did you hear it?Just as a further twist to this, I've been told that JR was close to COLIN IRELAND. I'm not suggesting he was involved but it's a bizarre link
I am sure I read that the daughter has a pretty good idea who the culprit is. Perhaps they have now found the evidence to pursue this.'They say they have uncovered a raft of new evidence, including a fresh motive, which is among a comprehensive dossier Lauren has put together with former Detective Superintendent Brian Edwards.''
- Lengthy articleView attachment 510340
- Rosie Dunn Mike Ridley 14 Jun 2024
My mum was stabbed 50 times in a car park in UK’s most mysterious cold case
THE DEVASTATED daughter of murdered businesswoman Penny Bell has revealed a new prime suspect could crack the cold case open decades on. Penny was savagely stabbed to death 50 times as she sat in h…www.thesun.co.uk- 'THE DEVASTATED daughter of murdered businesswoman Penny Bell has revealed a new prime suspect could crack the cold case open decades on.'
Unfortunately the police don't seem to listen to civilians (even those who are former murder detectives).I am sure I read that the daughter has a pretty good idea who the culprit is. Perhaps they have now found the evidence to pursue this.
Yes nail scrapings and false nails for example may not have been able to be tested in 1991 but could provide evidence now if stored correctly.Unfortunately the police don't seem to listen to civilians (even those who are former murder detectives).
Look at the problems Colin Sutton had getting anyone to listen to him that Levi Bellfield had killed Milly Dowler.
The forensic evidence is going to be tricky. There has been a lot of speculation that police misplaced evidence, so even if samples have been rediscovered, there may be issues about how they have been stored.
Let's hope so, although I don't think John Richmond is on the national DNA database, or that he would consent to giving a voluntary DNA sample.Yes nail scrapings and false nails for example may not have been able to be tested in 1991 but could provide evidence now if stored correctly.
It's nor known for definite, but the police suspect that the attack began at the leisure centre, in the stationary vehicle. It's suspected that the killer started the knife attack in the car, then got out of the vehicle and continued stabbing Penny through the driver's window.Is it known definitively that Penny was stabbed at the Leisure Centre? I ask because the description of her car being driven slowly and erratically, with the hazard lights flashing, makes it sound like she already had been or was being attacked at that very moment.
It's nor known for definite, but the police suspect that the attack began at the leisure centre, in the stationary vehicle. It's suspected that the killer started the knife attack in the car, then got out of the vehicle and continued stabbing Penny through the driver's window.
The last definite sighting of Penny was at 9.40am at her home. Many of the potential sightings are from people who came forward months or years after the murder, so there is a fair amount of uncertainty.
It's an interesting thought! People don't always react in the ways that you'd expect though. She might have frozen. Or events were happening so fast that she was trying to figure out what to do while being utterly terrified.it makes me wonder why Penny wouldn't have tried to escape from the car. If she was already in distress, but uninjured at that point, why not do something like open the door and scream? Her actions, if true, seem more like the actions of someone who was already injured and weakened.
That would make a lot of sense.Perhaps she didn't want to leave the £8,500 at her home with so many people there.
It's bizarre, isn't it?What sort of person waits months to announce that he was with a murder victim on the day of the murder? Some family friend he was.
Why was JR ruled out as a suspect despite finding his fingerprints all over the car, and why did he then go to the press to sell his story. If he was innocent, then you can imagine he was just trying to earn himself some quick money, if guilty surely he would be keeping well awayI suspect JR was a lot more talkative with journalists, than he ever was in police interview. I don't know what alibi he produced for the period between when he said he was dropped off, and when Penny reached the leisure centre. I also wonder where JR claimed to have met Penny that morning, and how he got to that location in the first place.
Why did he not keep away and just keep quiet? He has inserted and reinserted himself into the story by his own actions. It's almost like he's annoyed that he's not getting the recognition or attention he deserves. MOOWhy was JR ruled out as a suspect despite finding his fingerprints all over the car, and why did he then go to the press to sell his story. If he was innocent, then you can imagine he was just trying to earn himself some quick money, if guilty surely he would be keeping well away
Is it known for certain she had the money with her that morning? Just run an inflation checker and in todays terms that £8,500 would be £19,000 to £20,000 now. I think using todays terms is really helpful in understanding just how much cash she had on her. Imagine drawing out £20,000 today from a joint account and not mentioning it to your partner. You'd have to be seriously wealthy to consider it not worth mentioning. I'd still like to know what sort of sums she usually drew out to know how much more than usual it was.There's were four or five different teams of builders renovating Penny's home. On some days there were up to twenty workmen there.
Perhaps she didn't want to leave the £8,500 at her home with so many people there.
Otherwise why is she carrying so much money with her that day? She's due at work at 10.30am. Who is the money for?
A. The person she said she was meeting at 9.50am?
B. Someone she was meeting later at work or during her workday?
C. Someone she was meeting after work before she got back home?
D. Someone she planned to meet at a later date?
With options D, she would be carrying the money with her, rather than leaving it at home with so many people wandering about.
It seems almost certain that she had the money with her that morning.Is it known for certain she had the money with her that morning? Just run an inflation checker and in todays terms that £8,500 would be £19,000 to £20,000 now. I think using todays terms is really helpful in understanding just how much cash she had on her. Imagine drawing out £20,000 today from a joint account and not mentioning it to your partner. You'd have to be seriously wealthy to consider it not worth mentioning. I'd still like to know what sort of sums she usually drew out to know how much more than usual it was.
Do you have any links on this please?It seems almost certain that she had the money with her that morning.
Penny was indeed seriously wealthy and was spending a fortune doing up the house. Her husband said that she controlled the finances, and had drawn out much bigger sums in the past.