Discussion in 'Located Persons Discussion' started by tesni, Mar 5, 2021.
Or maybe it was just pre meditated that he was going to attack someone, anyone
Yes for sure, my husband is a key worker and I am not, however we were still able to send my son to school (I care for an elderly relative almost full time, so it was a godsend for us). Some schools state two, others just the one.
I know. It has. But it doesn't sit right with me. I'm not suggesting that they went out drinking together - but maybe, they had met. Maybe he liked the look of her. Maybe she looked like his wife when she was younger....
Just a list of maybes and an unexplained reason for her interacting with him make me think.
I think it can just be one parent. My mother is a teacher so considered essential and my sister been allowed to go for in-person learning essentially from the day it was allowed, even though her father is not classed as essential.
You can also see it here in movie form. Is the car waiting to turn right? Or is it stationery? Are both hazard lights on?
Perfectly put imo ❤️
Maybe they removed the dog from the house while it was being searched etc ??
My sisters husband works for the police. His normal week is 3 days in 4 days leave 4 days In 3 days leave and so on. Police leave is different to mine like I have to book leave?
As I understand this is what her family said, but there is the consideration that some friends just aren't known to your parents and some friends aren't aware of other friends
I have to say using the word 'friend' here just feels wrong
This is just how I feel too. It was me that posted the friends tribute to Sarah. The thread moves fast so I’ll link again for anyone who missed it and would like to read
This is not what Sarah would have wanted
I have been giving this some thought. I think the earliest LE linked WC was the weekend after Sarah went missing. IMO he had at least Thursday and Friday to do anything he needed to do and possibly Saturday too.
According to court reports from today, he called in sick on the 5th March with stress. So he can't have already been on sick leave, otherwise why would he call in sick. I see no reason to doubt the reports from today's court appearance - his last day at work was 2nd March, then he was due to be on leave until the 8th March, but called in sick on the 5th March.
I thought the passenger looked off too position wise but that it might be my eyes and the quality of image!
Or maybe he just attacked her
REMINDER: DOORSTEP VIGIL TONIGHT 9:30 pm
That is terrifying. Again more questions for the Met as to why they didn’t pounce ASAP.
I can - use the + and - 5 minute buttons
It's still kidnapping if she got in his car willingly and thought he was taking her home, but he refused to let her out and kept on driving towards Kent.
I would suspect that any footage including the car in question would have been removed as it’s evidence. The poynder/kings road traffic cam at 9.35pm is not there, along with the 9.40pm at Brixton hill/Christchurch along with some others further along the suspected route. I think it’s very unlikely you will find the car on any of the traffic cameras. IMO.
Maybe he did.
But why choose such a public place? If he was just intent on getting a random, London is a very big place. No need to choose a very busy thoroughfare to 'bundle' someone into a car.